Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The avoidance of constitutional questions and the preservation of judicial review: federal court treatment of the new habeas provisions

Article Abstract:

Congress unnecessarily feared the effect courts' habeas corpus powers would have on the implementation of the Antiterroism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). Courts' canons of interpretation already guide courts to follow the policy set forth by Congress. Only in rare instances will courts grant habeas such as when the innocent person needs protection, rather than in cases where habeas is sought for procedural injury. The interpretive approach courts take regarding AEDPA will by default meet Congress' intent.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Habeas corpus

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Madison's audience

Article Abstract:

James Madison's constitutional theory of the extended republic, which he later expounded in The Federalist No. 10, had much less influence on the writing and ratification of the Constitution than has been assumed. Contemporaneous notes by Madison's fellow Constitutional Convention delegate William Pierce indicated that Madison's original statement of his theory was poorly understood. Modern constitutional interpretations assuming Madison's contemporary influence should be reexamined.

Author: Kramer, Larry D.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1999
Evaluation, History, Influence, Biography, 18th century AD, Constitutional history, Constitutional conventions, The Federalist (Book), Madison, James

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Foreword: we the court

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the development of the concept of judicial review in the Supreme Court, the popular understanding of the court's supremacy in interpreting constitutional law, the Rehnquist court's shift into judicial sovereignty, and the fading of popular constitutionalism.

Author: Kramer, Larry D.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2001
Powers and duties, Public opinion, Judicial power, United States. Supreme Court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation, Judicial review
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The power of Congress to limit the jurisdiction of federal courts and the text of Article III. Mental decrepitude on the U.S. Supreme Court: the historical case for the 28th Amendment
  • Abstracts: Overview of state whistleblower protection statutes. Ignoring the wisdom of Article III courts: a study in NLRB intransigence
  • Abstracts: Enforceability of rule 26(c) confidentiality orders and agreements. Documentation retention in the electronic age
  • Abstracts: Franchisor liability for gender discrimination and sexual misconduct. Fair criticism, cyberlibel, and unlawful coordinated action over the Internet
  • Abstracts: "One royalty strike and you're out!": a franchisor's independent right to terminate a franchise agreement for nonpayment of royalties and the remedies available under the Lanham Act
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.