Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The hobgoblin of little minds? Our foolish law of inconsistent verdicts

Article Abstract:

Jury error manifested in inconsistent verdicts should be corrected by reversals of such verdicts where defendants' rights may have been infringed by juries with pro-government biases or other illegitimate biases. The US Supreme Court has not recognized the possibility and necessity of this middle ground with its solution of not disturbing inconsistent verdicts. Our system ensuring secrecy of jury deliberations should be supplemented by our support of justice.

Author: Muller, Eric L.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Verdicts, Judicial error

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Criminal procedure - Ninth Circuit provides inadequate due process protections for accused sex offenders

Article Abstract:

The US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Neal v. Shimoda incorrectly held that a condition of parole of accused sex offenders may be attendance in rehabilitative treatment programs where adherence to procedural protections exists. Due process requires hearings contesting sex offender status where the burden of proof is on the state and counsel is provided. Such procedural safeguards are necessary to the accuracy of such stigmitizing criminal classifications.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Sex offenders, Case Note

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Brady v Maryland and the search for truth in criminal trials

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court's decision of Brady v Maryland established a valid precedent on evidence disclosure that states should follow in criminal trials. The Court held that prosecutors must share material evidence which will help an accused, or else the Constitution's Due Process Clause has been violated. States are trying to follow this principle, but some state courts still have room for improvement.

Author: Hochman, Robert
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1996
Evidence (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Criminal procedure, Due process of law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The rhetoric of results and the results of rhetoric: judicial writings. What's an opinion for?
  • Abstracts: The concept of property and the Takings Clause. Taxation and the Constitution
  • Abstracts: Theory of the firm: what a corporation is. Recent SEC enforcement cases
  • Abstracts: Issues relating to tort liability for injuries on adjacent premises. The plaintiff's arsenal: emerging theories of liability in managed health care
  • Abstracts: Religious business ethics and political liberalism: an integrative approach. An Examination of the Legal and Ethical Public Policy Consideration Underlying DES Market Share Liability
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.