Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The insider story; rules against trading stocks, other securities with confidential information may broaden

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court will rule in United States v. O'Hagan on the misappropriation theory of insider trading in securities under Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Oral arguments took place in Apr 1997. Insider trading liability would expand if the court follows a theory of federal regulators. The misappropriation theory makes any person who uses wrongfully obtained nonpublic information to trade stock liable under Section 10(b), instead of only corporate officers and directors, as was the case before. The government insists that the theory is crucial to upholding the market's integrity.

Author: Reuben, Richard C.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Lawyers snared in alleged scam: New York D.A. claims they paid bribes to expedite insurance settlements

Article Abstract:

Manhattan District Atty Robert M Morgenthau on Sept 21 indicted 21 personal injury lawyers and 24 other people on charges involving payments to expedite $19 million in insurance claims. All but one defendant pleaded not guilty, and an attorney for one argued that the payments only sped up service without affecting the value of settlements. The charges include commercial bribery and scheming to defraud, including felony violations that could bring a four-year prison term and disbarment for any lawyers convicted.

Author: Jensen, Rita Henley
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law), Insurance industry, Investigations, Ethical aspects, Bribery, New York (State)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Cravath lawyer admits to insider trading: indictment claims brother made more than $250,000 from illegal stock buys

Article Abstract:

Cravath, Swaine & Moore associate Richard Woodward and his brother John pleaded guilty on June 28, 1995 to conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and will be sentenced Sept 15 to up to five years in prison. In May 1990, soon after he joined the elite firm, Richard began passing information to John about Cravath's clients targets and acquisitions. By Dec 1994 John had made more than $250,000 in 12 illegal trades. The incident is the first such the firm has endured, and rival firms are quietly delighted.

Author: Jensen, Rita Henley
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Officials and employees, Attorneys, Lawyers, Crime, Woodward, John, Cravath, Swaine and Moore, Woodward, Richard

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Securities fraud, Insider trading in securities, Insider trading (Securities)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The Brady rule: is it working? Its 30th anniversary is marked by debate. Zealous pro bono work leads to libel lawsuit
  • Abstracts: The revised proxy rules: an unfinished effort to improve shareholder communication. Shareholder initiatives, institutional investors and the SEC: 14A-8 proposals and new proxy rules
  • Abstracts: Patentability issues relating to interference counts. U.S. GATT legislation changes patent term. Should the clear & convincing evidence standard for rebutting the presumption of validity apply when the challenger raises a substantial new question of patentability?
  • Abstracts: Law firm web sites: going beyond the brochure: areas for other professionals and full or partial interactivity could draw larger audiences
  • Abstracts: Insurance may cover lawsuits over patents; courts are split on whether insurers have a duty to defend. No suit means no duty to defend or indemnify; California courts use literalist apporach to determine whether insurer's obligation kicks in
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.