Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The last word: jury is still out on effects of victim impact testimony

Article Abstract:

The use of victim impact testimony is controversial because there are no clear guidelines and it is an emotional appeal to impose the death penalty when moral reasoning is supposed to prevail. The disparity between how judges are permitting impact testimony is demonstrated by a comparison of Timothy McVeigh's Oklahoma City, OK bombing trial and Jesse Timmendequas' sexual predator trial. Emotional testimony was permitted in McVeigh's trial while the father of the victim read a previously approved statement in Timmendequas' trial.

Author: Gibeaut, John
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Shield a prosecution sword; rape laws can protect accuser who has reason to lie

Article Abstract:

A rape shield law is on the books of the federal government and of all the states. Such laws, introduced in the 1970s, aimed to protect rape victims by making sure defendants did not introduce irrelevant facts of their sexual pasts into evidence. Defendants have sometimes suffered because they could not introduce evidence of a rape victim's propensity to lie. Sometimes prior conduct which is not sexual is classified under the shield law.

Author: Gibeaut, John
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Rape, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An evidentiary dragnet: courts remain wary in introducing uncharged sex crimes

Article Abstract:

Courts have not embraced the expanded Federal Rules of Evidence admitting character evidence as proof of a crime in sexual assault cases. The difficulty is in balancing prejudicial and probative values with congressional intent under rules 403 and 413-415. Admitting evidence of uncharged crimes may undermine the presumption of innocence and thus be unconstitutional, even though it may be admitted to show motive.

Author: Gibeaut, John
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Evidence (Law), Evidence, Character, Character evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Testimony, Victims of crimes, Crime victims, Sex crimes
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The quest for privacy. None of your business. Encryption takes center stage: is government a trusty neighbor?
  • Abstracts: The Ryan White CARE Act: the allocation of Title II funding among programs by the states. Nursing home residents with HIV at admission: 2000-2004
  • Abstracts: Info-rich in the heartland. Profiting from experience: the right answer to a legal problem may come from trusting everything you've done in life
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.