Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The lawyerly rhetoric of Coase's 'The Nature of the Firm.' (Ronald Coase)

Article Abstract:

Ronald Coase employs a lawyerly, British rhetorical style in his essay 'The Nature of the Firm.' Coase's paper is so widely applicable because he does not limit himself to specific mathematical equations, but deals with empirical situations to explain and describe, rather than statistically show, the nature of the firm. The rhetoric is lawyerly in the way it brings up opposing arguments only to dismiss them as untrue and connects facts with unproven assumptions about human nature to persuade the reader.

Author: McCloskey, Donald N.
Publisher: University of Iowa Journal of Corporation Law
Publication Name: The Journal of Corporation Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0360-795X
Year: 1993
Economics, Rhetoric, Coase, Ronald H., Economics literature

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


John Marshall's judicial rhetoric

Article Abstract:

The rhetoric of US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall differs from the approach often taken by modern justices because of the different political conditions that Marshall faced. Modern judges no longer have to argue for the legitimacy of the rule of law, the judiciary and the other branches of government, as Marshall did. Because of the newness of the US in Marshall's time, his opinions focused less on precedent and more on serving justice, consistent with the will of the people.

Author: Eisgruber, Christopher L.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Supreme Court Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0081-9557
Year: 1996
History, Judicial process, Legitimacy of governments, Government legitimacy, Judicial opinions, Marshall, John (American Supreme Court justice)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Response to Clark Freshman, were Patricia Williams and Ronald Dworkin separated at birth?

Article Abstract:

Differing responses to the works of legal scholars Patricia Williams and Ronald Dworkin are a result of their differing approaches to jurisprudence and not racial or gender bias. Ronald Dworkin is an analytical philosopher and approaches jurisprudence in a rigorous manner. The work of Patricia Williams focuses on the use of narrative in the law, and her work has an uncertain connection to fact.

Author: Posner, Richard A.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1995
Law, Legal philosophy, Freshman, Clark

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Criticism and interpretation, United States, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The regulation of health care professionals other than physicians. The dilemmas of international financial regulation
  • Abstracts: Truth is the daughter of time: the real story of the Nestle case. Baby for sale; Mich. man tried to sell his daughter,
  • Abstracts: The debacle of corporate bankruptcy. On the controversial role of the European court in corporate tax cases. Corporate (mis)governance?
  • Abstracts: APEC: seven years of progress in trade liberalisation in the Asia Pacific?
  • Abstracts: Required reconsideration of "do-not-resuscitate" orders in the operating room and certain other treatment settings
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.