Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The lie that regulated benefit

Article Abstract:

Dartmouth Professor William A. Fischel's new book 'Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics and Politics' talks about the Pennsylvania Coal ruling on regulatory takings. The book also speaks about the land use law phrase 'average reciprocity of advantage' holding that the bad points of land use law regulation are on the average balanced by its good points. In the Pennsylvania Coal case, requiring coal mine owners to leave large blocks of coal at the periphery of coal mines prevented adjoining mines from collapsing. This reasoning cannot, however, be used to prohibit all mining and the average reciprocity of advantage rule can be shown not to make sense in other cases.

Author: Kanner, Gideon
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
California, Land use

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Justice Brennan's grand conservative moment

Article Abstract:

Liberal Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan displayed well-reasoned conservative thinking in his dissent in the 1981 San Diego Gas case, a regulatory takings matter. Brennan said just compensation was mandated in regulatory takings, based on his reading of the Constitution, and the rest of the Court ultimately agreed in a subsequent case. Brennan's conservative position represented the viewpoint of the majority and Chief Justice William Rehnquist on property rights, even though the San Diego case itself was dismissed on other grounds.

Author: Kanner, Gideon
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Analysis, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Eminent domain (Law), Conservatism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Mr. Justice Brennan: his imprint will endure

Article Abstract:

Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan was an amiable man who had been at the center in Earl Warren's Supreme Court, but later found himself ideologically at odds with Warren Burger. He believed in equal rights, human dignity, and due process. He dissented more heavily in the 1980s than in his early days on the court. He was sought-after as a speaker because of his vibrant and fresh ideas and insights into the law.

Author: Newman, Roger K.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Judges, Appreciation, Influence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Regulatory taking (Law), United States, Officials and employees, United States. Supreme Court, Brennan, William J., Jr.
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The league leader in legal assists. Vintage advice for California vintner. Gold Rush, thin stakes; U.S. branches face fierce competition from U.K. solicitors, accountants
  • Abstracts: Clothier relies on its in-house rabbi. Her job is mostly fun and games
  • Abstracts: Proposed Roth IRA regulations issued in question and answer format
  • Abstracts: Sobering thoughts: legislatures and courts increasingly are just saying no to intoxication as a defense or mitigating factor
  • Abstracts: Huge fees don't foil his company. Directing change at ITT industries
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.