Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The "new" old law of judicial access: toward a mirror-image nondelegation theory

Article Abstract:

Recent US Supreme Court environmental protection cases suggest a return to traditional standing requirements, where judicial review of administrative acts is granted only to plaintiffs who can show threats of direct and individualized injury. Simultaneously, the Court has adopted a highly deferential standard when reviewing agency action and agency interpretations of ambiguous Congressional legislation. The net effect has been to surrender legislative and judicial remedial powers to the executive branch, undermining the constitutionally mandated separation of powers.

Author: Mansfield, Marla E.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1993
Analysis, Laws, regulations and rules, Separation of powers, Judicial review of administrative acts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Getting help with their homework: schools, lower courts, and the Supreme Court Justices look for answers under the Establishment Clause

Article Abstract:

The author examines a number of late 20th Century Supreme Court decisions addressing religion and public education. Topics include the use of public schools by religious groups, school prayer, separation of religion and the state in a school context, and freedom of religious speech.

Author: Schneider, Ronna Greff
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 2001
Freedom of speech, Practice, Church and state, United States. Supreme Court, Religious education

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The liberalization of Article III standing: the Supreme Court's ill-considered endorsement of citizen suits

Article Abstract:

The author traces the history of standing doctrine and discusses Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, in which the Supreme Court ruled that an environmental group met Article III standing requirements in its suit against and incinerator owner/operator.

Author: Larza, Stephen
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 2000
Case Note, Citizen suits (Civil procedure), Citizen lawsuits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Standing (Law), Environmental law, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Perspectives on judicial review. Regulatory costs: the federal implementation plans. Legislative efforts concerning risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis for new regulations
  • Abstracts: Briseno's attorney looks back at trial. High court to blame for police insulation. Perils of privatization; corporations that take on government functions may face liability for Sec.1983 violations
  • Abstracts: The choice between formal and infomal modes of administrative regulation. Administrative informality in Japan: governmental activities outside statutory authorization
  • Abstracts: Antitrust and regulatory federalism: races up, down, and sideways. Corporate governance lessons from Russian enterprise fiascoes
  • Abstracts: Chromalloy: United States law and international arbitration at the crossroads. Achieving restitution: the potential unjust enrichment claims of indigenous peoples against multinational corporations
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.