Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The response of copyright to the enforcement strain of inexpensive copying technology

Article Abstract:

History has shown that the copyright laws in the US are flexible enough to compensate for the strains placed on them by new technology, and reforms are not needed to address copyright infringement issues raised by the Internet and improved copying technology. The Internet, among other technologies, has made reproduction and dissemination of copyrighted materials easier, but the industry and the courts have responded. Courts have narrowed the fair use doctrine, and copyright holders have employed various solutions. Rash legislative action is not needed, but periodic reconsideration of copyright laws is warranted.

Author: Srikantiah, Jayashri
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1996
Copyright infringement, Photocopying processes, Photocopying

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Copyright for functional expression

Article Abstract:

The import of the US Supreme Court's 1996 decision on the copyrightability of computer program user interfaces in Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc. lies in its inadvertant exposure of the inadequacies of copyright doctrine and policy. Judicial determinations of copyrightability refer to conventional descriptive categories, such as books versus machines, which rest on no underlying policy. The idea versus expression distinction is one of many doctrines created which disguise the lack of meaning and resultant inconsistencies.

Author: Weinreb, Lloyd L.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Software, Copyrights, Protection and preservation, Source code, Computer interfaces, Interfaces (Computers)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Journalists' copyright

Article Abstract:

There are competing proposals before the Australian Copyright Law Review Committee concerning the reform of journalists' copyright. The Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance favors inclusion of wire service and broadcast journalists under the law, and would give split ownership for reprints or subsequent use. The Combined Newspaper and Magazine Copyright Committee of Australia favors a repeal of section 35(4) of the 1968 Copyright Act, which gives split ownership to print journalists.

Author: Mullaly, Jennifer
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1993
Laws, regulations and rules, Journalists, Broadcasting rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Copyright
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A critique of the empirical methods of integrative social contacts theory
  • Abstracts: The effect of the prison environment upon inmate drug taking behaviour
  • Abstracts: The search for community in the workplace. Women in the workplace. Managing diversity in the workplace
  • Abstracts: Theories of regulation: incorporating the administrative process. Revoking your citizenship: minimizing the likelihood of administrative error
  • Abstracts: The debacle of corporate bankruptcy. On the controversial role of the European court in corporate tax cases. Corporate (mis)governance?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.