Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

This time around, the Eighth Circuit comes down with a reversal of Brown

Article Abstract:

The Eighth Circuit 1996 vacation of the Tax Court's decision in the Brown Group case properly addresses the questions surrounding controlled foreign corporation (CFC) earned Subpart F income. Brown's elaborate organizational scheme, involving CFCs and a foreign partnership, was the type of perceived tax loophole that should be addressed by Congress rather than by the courts. The Tax Court's withdrawal of its initial opinion, followed by the Eighth Circuit's vacation of the Tax Court's subsequent decision, illustrates the difficulty of judicially resolving complicated tax issues.

Author: Krauthamer, Nina
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Taxation of Investments
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-9115
Year: 1996
Partnerships, Multinational Corporations, Cases, BG, Brown Group Inc.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Brown Group shows interplay between Subpart F and partnership provisions

Article Abstract:

The Tax Court ruled in Brown Group that a controlled partnership could not be treated like a controlled foreign corporation for Subpart F income purposes under IRC section 957(a). The income of the controlled entity would then only be treated as Subpart F income to the parent if the controlled entity was seen as a sham. The Court found that the controlled partnership, Brinco, was established for legitimate business purposes and was not a sham. The Tax Court has decided to reconsider this case.

Author: Krauthamer, Nina
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Taxation of Investments
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-9115
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Treasury grapples with subpart F branch rule and 'hybrid branches.'

Article Abstract:

Two 1998 IRS notices address potential abuse of foreign tax audits and avoidance of applicable subpart F rules. Multinational corporations have begun to use foreign hybrid branches as a means of maximizing credits while limiting the tax liability of controlled foreign corporations under subpart F.

Author: Krauthamer, Nina
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Taxation of Investments
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-9115
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Foreign tax credit

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Taxation, Partnership, Partnerships, Controlled foreign corporations, international
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Carnes to 11th Circuit? A window on the making of a nominee. Rule 11 sanctions OK - without jurisdiction
  • Abstracts: Finding the right script: trial lawyers must fit their cases to the belief patterns of juries. Highlighting; putting the right emphasis on the proof in the case
  • Abstracts: Sailing solo: making the right tech choices when starting a solo or small-firm practice. E-options: online services simplify and streamline paper flow in law offices
  • Abstracts: Transfer pricing documentation: the EU code of conduct compared with member state rules (part 2). Transfer pricing documentation: the EU code of conduct compared with member states rules
  • Abstracts: The case law of the ECJ concerning the free provision of services: 2000-2005. A light in the darkness: recent developments in the ECJ's direct tax jurisprudence
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.