Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Toward a more diverse judiciary: the ABA needs to look at its process of evaluating nominees for the bench

Article Abstract:

The legal profession has been slow to attain the racial diversity in current society despite the efforts of some such as Bill Clinton who has nominated women or minorities for 54% of the lifetime federal judgeships open. Only 82 of the 1,527 sitting federal judges are black, 246 are women and 52 are Hispanic. The ABA's support for minority candidates is to be applauded but the judicial nominee evaluation process should also be modified to support minority candidates such as by supporting the participation of minority bars in selection and using defined criteria equally for all candidates.

Author: Smith, H.T.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Legislative Bodies, Judiciary, Demographic aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Under the congressional microscope: Judicial Conference responds to senator's request to curb judiciary's expenses

Article Abstract:

The Judicial Conference of the US is requesting financing for more federal judges while considering abolishing other judgeships in response to Sen Charles E. Grassley's survey. Grassley had surveyed federal judges on the best ways to cut court expenses. Judicial Conference policy changes on court facility use appear to have been prompted by the survey. Rather than abolish judgeships, however, the conference is likely to recommend maintaining indefinite vacancies.

Author: Carter, Terry
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Courts, Judicial Administration, Judicial Conference of the US, Finance, Federal courts, Practice, United States. Judicial Conference, Grassley, Charles E.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Standing up to critical scrutiny: our federal judiciary committee will not be undermined by dubious attacks

Article Abstract:

The credibility of the A.B.A. Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary has been unjustly attacked as politically biased in its ratings of judicial candidates. Lobbyists and politicians have claimed the committee has a liberal agenda, but the committee is nonpartisan, as a review of facts demonstrates. Of over 1,200 positions taken by the A.B.A., a few which have suited liberals have been focused upon by critics.

Author: Cooper, N. Lee
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Evaluation, Public opinion, A.B.A. Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Judges, President's Page, Judicial candidates
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Lawyers can revive their profession's image by rededicating themselves to their basic mission. Jurors prefer lawyers who are well-prepared - and not arrogant
  • Abstracts: Transferring life insurance policies to a new partnership. Guidelines for choosing the most favorable entity. Realistic discounts for undivided interests in real property
  • Abstracts: US tax scene. Towards a more comprehensive examination of the compatibility of indirect taxes with the internal market
  • Abstracts: The original understanding of the Takings Clause and the political process. The curious resurrection of custom: beach access and judicial takings
  • Abstracts: Alternative remedies in a negotiated settlement of the U.S. nationals' expropriation claims against Cuba. Key environmental legislation for Cuba's transition period
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.