Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Trustees do it better: analyzing Section 547(c)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code

Article Abstract:

The 'improvement in position' test of Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 Section 547(c)(5), which attempts to balance the interests of bankruptcy trustees with holders of floating security interests, is flawed. The test considers transfers to secured creditors as not preferential if they do not result in improved position relative to other creditors within a specified time period before bankruptcy. The test could be improved by extending the time period to one year and applying it only to ordinary business transactions. Trustees should challenge any unusual inventory acquisitions occurring shortly before bankruptcy.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1992
Secured transactions, Inventory loans, Bankruptcy trustees

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A reformed economic model of consumer bankruptcy

Article Abstract:

A reformed economic model should be applied to consumer bankruptcy laws to better analyze the impacts that bankruptcy laws have on consumers and creditors. A sociological approach to assessing behavior has replaced the traditional economic model in recent years, but this model has had limited predictive success, The most effective approach would be to integrate the concerns raised in the sociological approach into the components of the economic model that have been most effective.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1996
Models, Economic aspects, Bankruptcy law, Consumers, Bankruptcy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Analyzing differentiated-product mergers: the relevance of structural analysis

Article Abstract:

Structural analysis of differentiated product mergers should not be abandoned to the exclusive use of econometric analysis. Structural analysis is superior in its ability to determine competitors' coordinated interactions. Unilateral effects should not be the sole target of analysis and are not reliably predicted using econometric analysis. Structural analysis is particularly useful in litigated cases.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Analysis, Acquisitions and mergers, Market share, Decentralization (Management)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The jurisprudence of legitimacy: applying the Constitution to U.S. territories. Self-defense and subjectivity
  • Abstracts: Opportunities for profit beget horse breeding deductions. Contributions must be 'on account of' the tax year. Quitting a job does not make it temporary
  • Abstracts: Motivating employees to act ethically: an expectancy theory approach. Pharmaceutical advertisements: how they deceive patients
  • Abstracts: A breed apart? Security analysts and herding behavior. The workplace on the verge of the 21st century. Participation in the company of HBK-Spaarbank
  • Abstracts: Organizational justice as determinants of member satisfaction: a teachers' association experience. Perception of performance appraisal by employees and supervisors: self-serving bias and procedural justice
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.