Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Voluntary-aided school is not a state employer

Article Abstract:

A voluntary-aided school was not considered an emanation of the state by the UK Employment Appeal Tribunal in National Union of Teachers v. Governing Body of St. Mary's Church of England (Aided) Junior School. Therefore the EC Business Transfers Directive did not apply to the closing of two schools and creation of a new one. The National Union of Teachers and teachers who were dismissed had complained that the change should have been considered a transfer of undertaking, giving teachers from the old school a right to transfer to the new school.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1995
Education and state, Education policy, Church schools, Parochial schools

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Applying the Burchell guidelines

Article Abstract:

Two recent cases before the UK Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) demonstrate the importance of timing in applying the guidelines for employee dismissal due to misconduct set under British Home Stores Ltd v. Burchell. In Hamilton District Council v. Howie, the Burchell test was applied too late, after the industrial tribunal had already found misconduct. On the other hand, in Kirkcaldy District Council v. Woodward, the EAT determined that the Burchell decision had been applied correctly.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Dismissal for pregnancy-related illness not discriminatory

Article Abstract:

The Court of Session ruled in Brown v. Rentokil Ltd that the 1991 dismissal of an employee because of sickness related to pregnancy did not constitute sex discrimination. The decision was based on a questionable separation between illness and the pregnancy-related reason for the illness. Furthermore, under current law incorporating the EC Pregnant Workers Directive, the dismissal would be considered unfair automatically.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1995
Pregnant women, Sex discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Cases, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The EEOC has delineated the risk of liability for retaliation when an employer takes action against a worker who complains of discrimination or harassment
  • Abstracts: The secular trust revisited. Special needs trust: an estate planning tool for the disabled. Retirement distribution planning with trusts
  • Abstracts: Carpe demonstratores: towards a bright-line rule governing seizure in excessive force claims brought by demonstrators
  • Abstracts: "Law and culture in the future of Asia". Initial public offerings and interest income in Hong Kong. Public procurement system of Turkey towards full membership of the European Union
  • Abstracts: When disclosure is 'inevitable,' liability is not; with the Uniform Trade Secret Act and in court, the inevitable disclosure theory loses ground
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.