Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Weil group memo: go 'quid pro quo': suggested referral plan to repay big clients raises ethics issues, experts say

Article Abstract:

Weil, Gotshal & Manges' Strategy Committee advised in a May 18 report that the Manhattan firm set up a formal procedure for referring work on a mutual basis with major investment banks and accounting firms. Ethics experts say that poses conflict-of-interest problems, as referrals would be to reciprocating businesses rather than purely in the client's best interests, and the firm says it may not implement the suggestion. The committee is a group of 14 young partners asked to explore the firm's future.

Author: France, Mike
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Analysis, Ethical aspects, Client development, Legal ethics, Weil, Gotshal & Manges L.L.P.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Law firm data a juicy target for hack attack: as more lawyers go online, experts say firms should strengthen defenses

Article Abstract:

Law firms are increasingly vulnerable to computer hackers as computers become more vital to the work of many lawyers and remote access to data becomes more important. Few have been victimized thus far, but such theft has happened and will grow more common and more serious in a few years. Law firms tend to spend less on computer security than do other companies of comparable size. A direct connection to the Internet, while enormously convenient, also heightens the risk of a computerized break-in.

Author: France, Mike
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Safety and security measures, Prevention, Law firms, Access control, Computer hackers, Legal documents, Computer files

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Are telecoms discussing compliance or colluding? Companies say thy share information in an effort to ward off steep penalties under the sentencing guidelines

Article Abstract:

The arrival of the federal organizational guidelines in 1991 spurred telephone companies to start holding twice-yearly meetings on legal compliance programs. Participants say the meetings allow them to hear new ideas and talk about how to make their limited budgets stretch further, while some public interest lawyers fear that the meetings are a way for the industry to collude in setting the lowest possible compliance standards.

Author: France, Mike
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Human resource management, Telecommunications services industry, Telecommunications industry, Corporations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Bitter pill for Wal-Mart? Salaried professionals sue: the giant retailer may have to pay pharmacists overtime. Corporate productivity pressures spur white-collar suits
  • Abstracts: Treasury announces delay in proposed effective date of proposal making conversion of "large" C corporations to S corporations and further extends proposal
  • Abstracts: Clinton unveils appeals process in wetlands policy. She implements Clinton's policy supporting banks. Coalition wants state moratorium on 'Net tax
  • Abstracts: International Centre for Settlement of investment Disputes: Decision on Liability. CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Argentine Republic Annulment Decision, 25 September 2007
  • Abstracts: Fiscal state aid goes global. Multinationals, enforcement covenants and fair share. Conference Report: The EU and Third Countries: Direct Taxation, 13-14 October 2006, Vienna
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.