Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

What can trade associations and their officials do and say under competition law? - some recent Australian and American enlightenment

Article Abstract:

Trade associations and their officials are constrained under the Australian Trade Practices Act from engaging in such anti-competitive activities as price fixing. Recent American and Australian cases have tested the extent of this and comparable laws, and they have been shown to allow a wider range of communication among association officials than many have thought. Though these cases show that the concept of an understanding or arrangement in relation to price fixing is broad, they also show that an anti-competitive conspiracy must be proven to establish price fixing.

Author: Pengilley, Warren
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1993
Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Corporation law, Trade and professional associations, Professional associations, Trade associations, Price fixing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Installed base opportunism: market power in after-markets

Article Abstract:

The Australian High Court ruled that the after-market for Subaru parts in Regents Pty v. Subaru (Australia) Pty did not constitute the same market power control as in the US case of Eastman Kodak Co v. Image Technical Services. In Kodak, the US Supreme Court ruled Kodak had market control regarding their parts because they did not provide customers with necessary information at the time of purchase. In Regents, Subaru provided information and customers were not prevented from obtaining parts.

Author: Corones, Stephen G.
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1998
United States, Australia, Competition (Economics)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Singapore Airlines did not misuse its market power in changing arrangements with a tour wholesaler: it all depends upon the definition of "the market."

Article Abstract:

The Australian Federal Court, in Singapore Airlines v Taprobane Tours Pty, found that the airline did not violate the Trade Practices Act by cutting services and raising prices to a tour wholesaler. Taprobane charged abuse of market power and won in a lower court, but the full federal court cleared the airline, relying on a definition of the market which did not indicate abuse of power. The question of agency arrangements was not addressed and should be in the future.

Author: Pengilley, Warren
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1992
Airlines

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Market share
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Cafeteria plan regulations expand mid-year election menu. New law significantly alters retirement plan landscape
  • Abstracts: What corporate social responsibility means to me. The education of American business
  • Abstracts: What corporate social responsibility means to me. The four faces of corporate citizenship
  • Abstracts: Tax planning pays for the S corporation buyer and seller. Exclusions from income for qualified individuals employed outside the United States
  • Abstracts: U.S. pension law reform under GATT: Retirement Protection Act trims benefits in Congressional effort to recover lost tariff revenues
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.