Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

When temporary employees bring discrimination or labor suits against their employment agencies, the client-employers may be subject to joint liability

Article Abstract:

Employers assume that temporary employees resolve discrimination and labor disputes with their employment agencies, but suits suggest that this assumption occurs at employers' peril and that the client-employer of the temporary agency may be jointly liable. Before retaining an agency, employers should ask about their familiarity with matters of joint employment and how these have been handled when they have occurred previously. Employers should also think about giving the agency as much supervisorial and fiscal responsibility as is consistent with achieving business objectives.

Author: Giddens, Brent M.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Temporary employment, Joint tortfeasors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Rights act reshapes remedies

Article Abstract:

The Civil Rights Act of 1991 changes the available remedies for victims of discrimination. In addition to standard remedies such as back pay, the act allows compensatory and punitive damages in discrimination cases under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973. However, caps are placed on damage awards, except for those under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.

Author: Koch, Cora S.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Damages, Damages (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Supreme Court takes rare look at insurance; employment discrimination claims coverage increasingly includes punitive damages

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's 1999 ruling in Kolstad v. American Dental Ass'n is discussed, a case which held that punitive damages can be used even without egregious conduct by the employer. The chance that a punitive damages award would be insurable as a matter of a state's public public policy was also increased by Kolstad.

Author: Winter, Richard R.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
United States, Usage, Exemplary damages, Punitive damages

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Remedies, Employment discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: ADR and employment discrimination: a Massachusetts agency leads the way. Training labor abritrators in South Africa
  • Abstracts: Sherman Act can apply to criminal antitrust actions taken entirely outside the country, if theswe actions have foreseeable, substantial effect on U.S. commerce
  • Abstracts: Latin practices surge, but office openings lag; fragile economies and governments, easy commute, make firms hesitate
  • Abstracts: Forum selection; case removal. Automation comes to court: in multidistrict and complex lawsuits, computers manage documents and save money
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.