Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Wisdom without power: the Department of Justice's attempt to exempt federal prosecutors from state no-contact rules

Article Abstract:

The US Department of Justice's "Reno Rule" preempting federal prosecutors from state no-contact rules is based on sound policy, but Congress will have to grant the Department addition rule-making authority for the Reno Rule to withstand judicial scrutiny. Federal prosecutors argue that their ability to investigate has been limited by the patchwork of state laws that limit ex parte communications. The Reno Rule would exempt them from state ethical standards regarding such communications. Under present law, the Department would violate the Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council test.

Author: Schulman, Todd S.
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1996
United States. Department of Justice, Ethical aspects, Powers and duties, Public prosecutors, Delegated legislation, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Campaign finance reform - issue advocacy organization -Congress mandates contribution and expenditure requirements for section 527 organizations

Article Abstract:

Year 2000 amendments to Federal Election Campaign Act that require issue advocacy organizations to disclose their contributions and expenditures to the IRS are analyzed. The new law's failure to prevent such groups from reorganizing to evade regulation is criticized and suggestions for reforming the law are provided.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2001
Taxation, Campaign funds, Campaign finance reform

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Gideon's promise unfulfilled: the need for litigated reform of indigent defense

Article Abstract:

The author suggests a short-term strategy of litigated reform for institutionalizing the Gideon v. Wainwright and Argersinger v. Hamlin mandates to ensure fair trials by requiring effective assistance of counsel for indigent defendants.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
Standards, Models, Organizational change, Criminal justice, Administration of, Administration of criminal justice, Right to fair and impartial trial, Court-appointed counsel, Fair trial, Court appointed counsel

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Right to counsel
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: No way out: an argument against permitting parties to opt out of U.S. securities laws in international transactions
  • Abstracts: Repeal Employment Act. Yes: prosecutors must not act as legislators. Combined plan limit repeal; both employers and employees who participate in tax-qualified retirement plans can benefit from change in tax code
  • Abstracts: Disgorgement of fees paid to a professional person in bankruptcy. Dismissal of cases via 11 U.S.C. section 707: bad faith and substantial abuse
  • Abstracts: Printz, state sovereignty, and the limits of formalism. The new etiquette of federalism: New York, Printz, and Yeskey
  • Abstracts: From jeans to genes: the evolving nature of property of the estate. It's all fun and games until somebody declares bankruptcy: a debtor's right to season ticket holder status
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.