Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

You booze, you lose; NYC seizure of autos in first time DUI cases may grease skids for federal bill encouraging forfeiture

Article Abstract:

New York City has begun taking the vehicles of those facing a first drunk driving charge, and other jurisdictions have similar policies for repeat offenders. Because forfeiture is a civil remedy with a lesser burden of proof, defendants could lose their vehicles even if they are absolved of a drunk driving charge. The federal bill would apply only to repeat offenders and encourage state policies on automobile forfeiture by including it as one of the options for states trying to qualify for federal highway safety funds.

Author: McDonald, Alexandra Varney
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
Cases, Remedies, Searches and seizures, Drunk driving, Driving while intoxicated

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Escape from arbitration; sticking point in adhesion contracts ruled 'unfair.'

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit refused in Hooters of America v. Phillips to enforce the company's binding arbitration program, finding the contract provisions to be unfair, and this is but one example of several such rulings. Contractual arbitration provisions that must be signed as a condition to employment or other employee benefits are attracting particular scrutiny by the courts.

Author: McDonald, Alexandra Varney
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
Interpretation and construction, Labor contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Mixing it up with Miranda; 4th Circuit, conservative groups back 1968 law overturning rule on warnings

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled in United States v. Dickerson ruled that a 1968 federal law passed shortly after United States v. Miranda had overturned the decision that police must inform suspects of their rights. The Washington Legal Foundation and the Safe Streets Coalition were responsible for an amicus curiae brief on which the court cased its ruling.

Author: McDonald, Alexandra Varney
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
Laws, regulations and rules, Right to counsel, Miranda rule, Self-incrimination, Self incrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Microsoft judge gets decision 'roadmap;' proposed findings of fact in historic case have a few surprises
  • Abstracts: Trading on trial outcomes; industry analysts monitor big cases to keep tabs on stock probabilities. Go West, young publishers; court frees up case notations for use by competing cut-rate researchers
  • Abstracts: ABA goes over head of INS on detainee issue; ABA says INS refuses to give pro bono lawyers access to some detainees
  • Abstracts: Betting on cyberspace; when it comes to the future of Internet gambling, all wagers are off. New push for going mobile; European-style cross-border practices may be the next big wave here
  • Abstracts: A warning on a product may not bar liability, two courts hold in decisions citing the new Restatement. Guilt by association(s)? Injured plaintiffs sue groups that promote faulty products and standards
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.