Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Library and information science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Library and information science

Notaries public - lost in cyberspace, or key business professionals of the future?

Article Abstract:

Notaries public can play an important role in verifying digital signatures in online transactions. An impartial certification authority or cybernotary is needed to verify the authenticity of digital signatures. In the US, however, the position of notary public is held in less respect than in other countries. Steps should be taken to increase the qualifications and training required to obtain a notary commission. The large number of notaries existing today is unnecessary and has contributed to lowering the status of the office. Problems with and suggestions for digital signature legislation are also discussed.

Author: Closen, Michael L., Richards, R. Jason
Publisher: John Marshall Law School
Publication Name: The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 1078-4128
Year: 1997
On-Line Information Services, Telegraph & other communications, Videotex & Teletext Svcs NEC, Internet services, Online information services, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Document authentication in electronic commerce: the misleading notary public analog for the digital signature certification authority

Article Abstract:

The question of whether notary publics should serve as the model for a digital signature certification authority is discussed. Topics include parallels between notaries and a certification authority, the notary's role as a public officer, current drawbacks in the training and education of notaries, and the need for strict regulation.of certification authorities.

Author: Anderson, John C., Closen, Michael L.
Publisher: John Marshall Law School
Publication Name: The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 1078-4128
Year: 1999
Analysis

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Utah Digital Signature Act as "model" legislation: a critical analysis

Article Abstract:

An analysis of the provisions of the Utah Digital Signature Act is presented. Topics include the difference between electronic and digital signatures, the means of creating digital signatures, the role of certification authorities, or 'cybernotaries,' criticism of the Utah Act's recordkeeping rules, and recommended improvements to the Model Act.

Author: Richards, R. Jason
Publisher: John Marshall Law School
Publication Name: The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 1078-4128
Year: 1999
Models, Law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Innovations, Laws, regulations and rules, Digital signatures, Digital signatures (Authentication), Notaries, Electronic commerce, E-commerce
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Network externalities, price discrimination and profitable piracy. Consumer heterogeneity, incomplete information and pricing in a duopoly with switching costs
  • Abstracts: Integration and access regulations in telecommunication. A spatial taxonomy of broadband regions in the United States
  • Abstracts: Keeping business out of the bedroom: protecting personal privacy interests from the retail world
  • Abstracts: Keeping business out of the bedroom: protecting personal privacy interests from the retail world. part 2 Revising the Freedom of Information Act for the information age: the Electronic Freedom of Information Act
  • Abstracts: The accounting revenue division in international telecommunications: conflicts and inefficiencies. Econometric modelling of Spanish very long distance international calling
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.