Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Appeals court upholds liability for 'gun for hire' ad

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit has ruled that the Soldier of Fortune Magazine is liable for printing an advertisement that led to a hired killing. The magazine had asked the court to follow the ruling of the 5th Circuit in Eimann, where the magazine was not held liable because an ad was considered ambiguous and not commercial speech. But the 11th Circuit disagreed, stating that it was clearly a commercial advertisement and the ad could clearly be interpreted to be a public risk.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Negligence, Soldier of Fortune (Periodical)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Appeals court strikes Florida law limiting use of term 'psychologist.'

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that Florida's law restricting psychologists from advertising unless they are licensed is unconstitutional. Florida does not regulate psychologists and psychologists are licensed by a public board. The court stated that, since the state had chosen not to regulate the profession, Florida could guard the public against misleading advertising by better means other than attempting to control psychologists' speech.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Psychologists

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court strikes down ban on CPA solicitation

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court ruled in Edenfield v. Fane that a Florida ban on direct solicitation by certified public accountants infringed the First Amendment's commercial speech doctrine. The judges ruled that the imposition of such a ban on CPAs posed dangers to society's access to complete and accurate commercial information. The judges also disagreed with a Florida Board of Accountancy position that state interests were advanced by the ban.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Advertising, Direct marketing, Accountants

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Commercial speech doctrine
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Appeals court upholds win in 'mad cow' lawsuit. Comments about fake T-shirt ad did not harm reputation. 'Dateline' can be liable for specific misrepresentation
  • Abstracts: Court approves closing of jury selection. Maryland court strikes down trial closure. Courts allow order requiring journalists to sign secrecy agreement
  • Abstracts: Public records held by private agencies must be reasonably accessible to public
  • Abstracts: Housing authority runs group into red. Political patronage: closed system costs students, taxpayers
  • Abstracts: Computer service not responsible for libel. Opinions admissible in libel case. Alabama court send libel case back to jury
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.