Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

"Can we tape?" A practical guide to taping conversations in the 50 states and D.C

Article Abstract:

Journalists should be aware that the laws governing audio taping conversations and using hidden cameras vary from state to state. In the majority of states, a conversation can be taped as long as one party, the taping party, consents, but in 12 states, all parties must consent. When making interstate calls, reporters should assume that the more stringent laws apply. Possessing taped conversations illegally obtained can result in both civil and criminal penalties. Twelve states have outlawed use of hidden video and still cameras in private places.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1996
United States, Electronic surveillance, Investigative reporting, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Senate broadens scope of restrictions against disclosure

Article Abstract:

The US Senate has amended its rule regarding disciplinary action for those who leak confidential information to the press. Rule XXIX(5) has been amended to include not only senators and senate officers, but senate committee, subcommittee and office staff members. Violators of the rule may be expelled or fired, and face contempt of Congress charges. The amending of the rule was the result of leaks to the press during the Clarence Thomas and Keating Five hearings.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Human resource management, United States. Congress. Senate

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court allows naming of AIDS-virus carrier

Article Abstract:

The Illinois Appellate Court has ruled that the state's AIDS Confidentiality Act does not make it illegal to publish the names of suspects charged with criminal transmission of the AIDS virus. The court stated that the law was not intended to apply to those criminally charged with AIDS transmission and, because the names of such persons can be obtained from public court files, the news media does not have to apply for an exception.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
AIDS patients, Criminals

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Confidential communications
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: "Can we tape?" A journalist's guide to taping phone calls and in-person conversations in the 50 states and D.C
  • Abstracts: Police records: a guide to effective access in the 50 states & D.C. The Driver's Privacy Protection Act: a federal collision with states' rights
  • Abstracts: Access to electronic records: a guide to reporting on state and local government in the computer age. U.S. must give British extradition letter to lawyer
  • Abstracts: Police may continue to withhold investigative records even though no charges filed after two years. Legal bills not exempt from public disclosure
  • Abstracts: The historical paradoxes of manhood in Cooper's 'The Deerslayer.'. The geography of violence: historical fiction and the national question
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.