Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Civil lawsuit over release of tapes of congressional phone call dismissed

Article Abstract:

The US DC District Court dismissed a suit brought by Rep John Boehner against Rep James McDermott. McDermott had delivered to newspapers a taped telephone conversation in which Boehner and other House Republican leaders discussed political strategy regarding Rep Newt Gingrich's alleged ethics violations. Two citizens who used a police scanner to tape Boehner's cell telephone conversation delivered it to McDermott. The Court ruled McDermott's receipt of the tape did not violate wiretapping laws prohibiting interception. Boehner announced he would appeal.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
Wiretapping

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Federal driver's record act labeled an invalid exercise of congressional power

Article Abstract:

The US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a South Carolina trial court ruling that the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) violated states rights under the Tenth Amendment. The DPPA restricts access to driver information located in state motor vehicle department records. South Carolina Attorney General Charlie Condon sued in District Court in South Carolina, claiming Congress had no power to regulate state use of motor vehicle records.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
South Carolina, Public records, Access control, Legislative power

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Present from justices may signal end of party

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the effects which the US Supreme Court's decision in Bartnicki v. Vopper may have on the press, even though the decision upheld First Amendment rights.

Author: Mauro, Tony
Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 2001
Editorial, Analysis, Freedom of the press

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Incitement lawsuit against Stone, "Natural Born Killers" dismissed. 'Hit list' kept by anti-abortionists deemed protected speech
  • Abstracts: Boeing payments to Senator raise questions. Senate votes to require fraud probes. Bill pushes new joint acquisition power
  • Abstracts: Privacy exemptions may prove higher hurdle than national security. Inmate health care: officials ignore warning signs; care lacking or too late
  • Abstracts: Dangerous skies: Agency roadblocks overcome to show millions of potential weapons seized. Federal money: Security official equally confounded by list documenting stakes critical assets
  • Abstracts: Cardiovascular medicine: the current state of the art. Biological hazards and medical care in space. Suspended animation: the cold facts
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.