Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Court finds 'slut' is defamatory without need to prove damages to reputation

Article Abstract:

The Illinois Supreme Court ruled in Bryson v. News America Publications that a short story referring to a character as a "slut" could be considered defamatory per se without evidence that the plaintiff's reputation was actually harmed. The Court rejected arguments that the story was opinion, that the term "slut" was open to interpretation, that the statute of limitations had run and that the full name of the plaintiff was not used. The Court found that the state Slander and Libel Act's per se false accusations of fornication and adultery category applied to the story.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1997
Illinois, Short stories

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


City supervisor not public official, figure: court rules calling street repair "paving" is defamatory

Article Abstract:

The Minnesota Court of Appeals in St. Paul ruled in LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. that the Duluth Street and Traffic Maintenance Supervisor was not a public figure for libel purposes. The Court affirmed a libel award against the Duluth News Tribune for articles that claimed that the plaintiff paved the street upon which he was the only resident. The plaintiff was not a public figure because he was not involved in policy matters even though he was a public employee and a supervisor.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1995
Minnesota, Public officers, Government officials

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Fictional characterization not defamatory

Article Abstract:

The California Supreme Court, in Polydoros v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., rejected a defamation suit based on the alleged portrayal of the plaintiff as a boy in the movie 'The Sandlot.' Michael Polydoros claimed the depiction also invaded his privacy by appropriating his image for commercial purposes. The Court let stand the holding that the film was constitutionally protected fiction which could neither have defamed Polydoros nor have appropriated his likeness.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1999
United States

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Libel and slander, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Court finds prosecutor's right to cross-examine can trump reporter's privilege
  • Abstracts: Examining gang life: weekly writer looks at root causes of violence. Congressional travel: tracking those all-expenses-paid trips
  • Abstracts: General Dynamics Electric Boat wins submarine work. Primagraphics wins electric boat graphics work
  • Abstracts: MANPADs pose global threat to airlifters. Lawmakers: time to up rewards for SAMs in Iraq. Pentagon Okays Stryker Brigade for Iraq
  • Abstracts: Writing investigative books. New investigative authors echo themes of original muckrakers. Shaking the Foundations: 200 Years of Investigative Journalism in America
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.