Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Dismissal of privacy suit over story on runaway and her puppy upheld

Article Abstract:

The Alabama Supreme Court ruled in Cooley v. WALA-TV, Inc. that a television station did not violate the privacy of a teenage runaway and her family in broadcasting a story about her and the killing of her dog because it was a matter of great public interest. The family argued that the station disclosed private facts regarding the fact that she was a runaway and was placed in a juvenile detention center. The trial court and the Supreme Court both found that the story was truthful and that the public was interested in the dog's safety and, by extension, the safety of the dog's master.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1996
Alabama

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Different results in two suits over TV crews on police raids

Article Abstract:

Suits against television stations and police for allowing cameras into homes during searches have prompted both TV station settlements and verdicts favoring TV stations. In Parker v. Multi-Media KSDK, Inc., a US district court found that the police violated the plaintiffs' civil rights in allowing taping but the TV station did not violate their civil rights. KAAL-TV in Austin, MN chose to settle an invasion of privacy and trespass suit based on similar coverage of a police raid.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1996
United States, Searches and seizures, Police, Police officers, Media coverage, Minnesota

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Privacy claim over televised rescue reinstated

Article Abstract:

The California Supreme Court ruled in Shulman v. Group W. Productions that two auto accident victims could sue a news service for privacy invasion. Footage of the victims at the accident site and being transported to the hospital was televised. The court agreed the victims did not have a right of privacy at the accident site, but stated they did have such rights while being taken to the hospital.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
California

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Television broadcasting of news, Television news
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: New York high court throws out privacy suit filed over photograph. Calendar photograph violated doctor's privacy
  • Abstracts: Appeals court affirms contempt citations. Between a Roche and a hard place. Student jailed for refusing to identify sources
  • Abstracts: Court expands fair report privilege to private individuals. Judge's libel suit over 'crystal ball' allegation properly dismissed
  • Abstracts: The ultimate prior restraint. Gag order overturned on school desegregation plan: secret meetings violated right to gather news, court rules
  • Abstracts: ABC complies with order to turn over videotape of Susan McDougal interview. Contempt citation against book author overturned after second appeal: plaintiffs in suit failed to overcome journalist's privilege
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.