Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

New York high court throws out privacy suit filed over photograph

Article Abstract:

The New York Court of Appeals ruled in Howell v. New York Post Co that a psychiatric hospital patient's privacy had not been violated by newspaper publication of her photograph without her consent. The court based its ruling on the story being newsworthy because the photograph showed Howell and Hedda Nussbaum. The latter is still at the hospital recovering from abuse by Joel Steinberg. Photos which constitute privacy invasions also need to be disguised advertisements, which this was not.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Calendar photograph violated doctor's privacy

Article Abstract:

The New York Court of Appeals upheld the Appellate Division's decision that use of a photograph without the person's consent is an invasion of privacy. The Choices Women's Medical Center had published a calendar promoting its services and highlighting women influential in the women's women's movement. A photograph highlighting one woman identified Dr Cordia Beverley in the background. Beverley sued and was awarded both compensatory and punitive damages.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Medical centers, Advertising, Photographs

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court says search, seizure violated federal privacy law

Article Abstract:

The US Western District Court in Texas held in Steve Jackson Games v. Secret Service that the Secret Service violated the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 with a search and seizure at the offices of an electronic bulletin board owner. The Privacy Act forbids the seizure of work product from disseminators of public information, and the court agreed the seized material was work product rather than 'fruits of a crime' as the government contended.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Searches and seizures, Work product privilege (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Open defendant's psychosexual exam, court orders. County settles suit over seized transcript
  • Abstracts: General Dynamics wins super Hornet gun contract. United Defense wins navy missile launcher contract. GE Aircraft Engines wins Navy logistics contract
  • Abstracts: Space newspeak or kill the countdown! The moon pyramid. Intermittents
  • Abstracts: Appellate court, state legislature deal blows to efforts for reporter's privilege. Reporters jailed for refusal to testify at trial
  • Abstracts: D.C. Council considers enacting shield law. Legislature passes nation's 31st shield law after long struggle. A special role for the media?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.