Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Paper allowed to print photo of juvenile murder suspect: Rehnquist denies appeal to 13-year-old boy charged in mobile home fire

Article Abstract:

The North Carolina Supreme Court vacated a lower court order in A Minor Charged in this Proceeding ex rel. Mitchell v. Fayetteville Observer-Times and allowed the media to publish the name and likeness of a 13-year-old arson and murder suspect. The trial court had closed the case and restrained the press from publishing any information about the suspect, even though his photo and name had already been released, because the court felt fair trial rights were at risk. The Supreme Court of North Carolina agreed with the press and found that the trial court's orders were prior restraints.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1995
Juvenile homicide

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Contempt conviction of paper, publisher for violating judge's gag order overturned

Article Abstract:

The Kansas Supreme Court ruled in State v. Alston that a gag order and subsequent contempt order levied against the Atchison Daily Globe constituted a prior restraint that the trial court had failed to justify. To closed court proceedings to reporting, there must be demonstration of harm to fair trial rights and less restrictive means of protecting these rights must be exhausted first. The Court stated that media organizations should appeal injunctions before publishing and violating a gag order, even if it is apparently unconstitutional.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1995
Kansas

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


CNN airs apology, pays fine for violating court order

Article Abstract:

US District Court for the Southern District of Florida Judge William Hoeveler found in United States v. Cable News Network that CNN was guilty of criminal contempt in airing tapes from Manuel Noriega's trial in violation of a court order. Hoeveler ruled that his instructions were adequate and that the fair trial implications of releasing such information were sufficiently compelling. CNN's sentence was to pay an $85,000 fine and air an admission that it was in error in broadcasting the tapes.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1995
Cable News Network

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Free press and fair trial, Pretrial publicity, Right to fair and impartial trial, Prior restraint, Gag orders
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Marketing of violent entertainment appears twice on Senate committee's schedule. Congress considers camera bills; state courts open doors
  • Abstracts: Crooks cited bogus Pentagon reports. Plane makers bought suspect parts by the thousands
  • Abstracts: Plan set for annual IRE board elections. Annual conference hosts huge crowd in Washington, D.C.. Embedding delivered propaganda as well as important information
  • Abstracts: Dangerous skies: Agency roadblocks overcome to show millions of potential weapons seized. Federal money: Security official equally confounded by list documenting stakes critical assets
  • Abstracts: Bad air investigating pollution: dirty deals in reshaping economy, county eases way for diesel truck pollution
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.