Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Publicity does not create presumption of bias, court finds

Article Abstract:

The US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals decided in DeLisle v. Rivers that a defendant in a murder trial was not unfairly tried even though jury members had been aware of pretrial publicity. The defendant was charged with intentionally driving a car containing his family into a river, thereby killing his four children. Media reports before the trial indicated the defendant had said in a police interrogation he purposely drove the car into the river. The Court ruled that jury questionnaires and in-court questioning had ensured impartiality.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Jury selection

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Media allowed to intervene to view governor's deposition

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, in In re: Associated Press, reversed the holding of the federal district court that allowed the deposition of Illinois Gov. Jim Edgar in a criminal trial to be taken without the media in attendance. Edgar testified in Nov. 1997 in James R. Berger's criminal trial. The Court ruled that the district court erroneously placed Edgar's deposition under seal without stating a specific reason for it.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1999
Governors, Depositions, Privileges and immunities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Newspaper free to print time records of court-appointed lawyer

Article Abstract:

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the dissolving of a restraining order preventing newspaper publication of information from court-appointed defense counsels' records leaked to a newspaper in a capital murder trial. The court ruled the material to be of legitimate public interest, thus no rational basis existed to continue preventing newspaper publication.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1999
Tennessee

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Free press and fair trial, Pretrial publicity, Right to fair and impartial trial
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Congress can regulate release of drivers' records: high court overturns challenge to Driver's Privacy Protection Act
  • Abstracts: Access to places. New state regulations, court rulings restrict media access to prisons
  • Abstracts: Campaign reporting: a guide to election records and events. Journalists meet with official interference over reporting
  • Abstracts: US uses a rare 'state secrets' privilege - twice. Agencies, courts must segregate portions of records
  • Abstracts: City boycott of newspaper does not violate publisher's constitutional rights: Oakland Council was not acting as regulator, court finds
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.