Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Reporter, newspaper cited for printing file details

Article Abstract:

A federal district judge in Raleigh, NC, found a bureau chief for The (Wilmington) Morning Star in contempt of court for accepting a court file that contained a confidential document in Ashcraft v. Conoco. The document contained a secret settlement between residents of Wrightsboro, NC, and Conoco Oil Co. Conoco Oil Co. was accused of contaminating the residents' water supply. A court clerk mistakenly included the document in a file given to the bureau chief. The newspaper and the bureau chief were fined $500,000 and the jail sentence for the bureau chief was to be determined on Feb 24, 1998. An appeal was planned.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
North Carolina, Contempt of court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Documents remain confidential to protect college's privacy

Article Abstract:

The Georgia Supreme Court, in Savannah College of Art & Design, Inc. v. School of Visual Arts, Inc., held that a confidential settlement agreement between a private visual arts school and a private college of arts could remain private to protect the college's privacy interests. The court rejected a lower court finding that the college had waived its rights to confidentiality when it filed the settlement documents with the court in order to challenge a newspaper's motion to unseal the documents.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1999
Georgia, Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Public has no right of access to plea agreement that was revoked

Article Abstract:

The US DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in United States v. El-Sayegh that The Washington Post could not have access to a sealed plea agreement because the agreement did not lead to a guilty plea. The case involved a suspected terrorist who had been extradited from Canada and who was expected to plea guilty. He pled not guilty and the court dismissed the case. The appellate court reversed a lower court in keeping the agreement sealed, indicating the document had no judiciary role.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
United States, Plea bargaining, Media coverage

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Access control, Court records
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Judge bars naming juvenile sex crime victims. National Public Radio not a government entity, judge rules
  • Abstracts: Newspaper liable for printing wrong photo in Whitewater trial
  • Abstracts: City boycott of newspaper does not violate publisher's constitutional rights: Oakland Council was not acting as regulator, court finds
  • Abstracts: Lyly's 'Endymion' and 'Midas': the Catholic question in England. Damnable deconstructions: Vice language in the interlude
  • Abstracts: 'Seinfeld' quiz book violates producers' copyrights in show. 'Son of Sam' royalties law violates First Amendment
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.