Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Texas Appeals Court moves away from opening discovery materials

Article Abstract:

The Upjohn Co has been attempting to keep its records regarding its medication Halcion closed to the public in a series of trials and appeals in Texas. The company petitioned a district court of appeals for a restraining order in one case to prevent access to clinical test records it supplied during discovery. When these records were admitted as evidence, the company sought to have the restraining order extended and the Dallas Morning News sued. The Texas Supreme Court allowed the order to remain in affect, and the case in the district court of appeals proceeded. Found liable for negligence in Nov 1992, Upjohn has appealed.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Pharmaceutical preparations, Ornamental nursery products, Discovery (Law), Upjohn Co.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Federal judge rejects motions to seal briefs

Article Abstract:

Judge Frank Easterbrook, of the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, has denied requests in two cases to seal records. In Lopacich v Falk, a brother sued by his sister in an inheritance dispute tried to have his financial records sealed. In In re Grand Jury Proceedings, a doctor refused to produce patients' records and the US Attorney's Office handling his appeal wanted its brief sealed. Easterbrook refused, stating that the parties had not demonstrated sufficient cause for closure.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Briefs, Legal briefs

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Appeals court orders judge to release remarks

Article Abstract:

The Georgia Supreme Court ruled that a judge's comments, made in open court, were part of the court's records and, therefore, subject to the state's Uniform State Court Rule 21. The court stated that the law grants judges limited discretion when closing records to public access and that the judge waived his right to such discretion when he spoke in open court. The court did note, however, that the state's Open Records Act did not apply to the judiciary.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Access control, Court records
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Release of psychiatrists' names would invade privacy. Court denies release of course materials
  • Abstracts: Appeal court recognizes reporter's privilege in trucking suit. Iowa high court extends privilege to criminal cases, grand juries
  • Abstracts: High Court denies prosecutors immunity. Principal is public official, Vermont high court rules
  • Abstracts: Judge bars naming juvenile sex crime victims. National Public Radio not a government entity, judge rules
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.