Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Mass communications

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Mass communications

Extra authority: this week's changes to the Broadcasting Bill allow groups to run two FM stations in one area and give regulators extra power - but will choice be preserved?

Article Abstract:

The debate over changes to the Broadcasting Bill have caused divisions in the radio industry. The government wants companies to have two FM and one AM license in one area or vice versa. However there are concerns that larger radio stations would move their main FM frequencies leaving the AM wavebands occupied by the small and medium independent operators. The smaller operators see the plan as a further concentration of ownership leading to reduced listener choice. The radio autority (RA), the industry regulator, will pass judgement on individual cases.

Author: Deans, Jason
Publisher: EMAP Maclaren Ltd.
Publication Name: Broadcast
Subject: Mass communications
ISSN: 0040-2788
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


DMGT fails 'public interest' test by RA

Article Abstract:

The planned purchase of Leicester Sound from GWR by DMG Radio, a subsidiary of Daily Mail and General Trust, has been blocked by the UK Radio Authority. This move has cast a shadow over plans by GWR to sell an 11% stake in London News Radio, as an agreement with DMG Radio stated that the latter would purchase both this stake and Leicester Sound. The Radio Authority has expressed concerns about the implications of Daily Mail and General Trust owning both the Leicester Mercury newspaper and the largest radio station in the Leicester area.

Author: Smith, Christine
Publisher: EMAP Maclaren Ltd.
Publication Name: Broadcast
Subject: Mass communications
ISSN: 0040-2788
Year: 1997
Radio stations, Daily Mail and General Trust PLC

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


No BBC upheaval plan says Labour

Article Abstract:

The UK Labour party has denied reports that it would transfer the powers of the governors of the BBC to regulate programme content to a new cross-media body if it wins the forthcoming general election. It points out that it has no intention of causing major disruption at the BBC. Even if a single regulatory body were created for broadcasting and telecommunications by a future Labour government, the BBC would continue to operate as it does at present.

Author: Deans, Jason
Publisher: EMAP Maclaren Ltd.
Publication Name: Broadcast
Subject: Mass communications
ISSN: 0040-2788
Year: 1997
Television Broadcasting, Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities, Television broadcasting stations, Broadcast Regulation, United Kingdom, Television broadcasting industry, British Broadcasting Corp., Labour Party (United Kingdom), Broadcasting regulations, Broadcasting policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Radio broadcasting, Radio broadcasting industry, Management, Planning
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Three falling: has ITV lost its popular touch? With the network inreasingly reliant on soaps to deliver the ratings, its needs to find a fresh crop of hits to avoid becoming hidebound
  • Abstracts: Dawing realisation: Dawn Airey's rapid rise to C4 controller of arts and entertainment raised a few eyebrows but she has swiftly proved herself
  • Abstracts: The race to conquer Europe. Evans above: as News Corp attempts to beam the Sky brand to the entire planet, David Evans is the man co-ordinating programming and creating sporting events to satisfy the global hunger of the media giant's channels
  • Abstracts: Something wild. Carlton close to signing deal for launch in India
  • Abstracts: Pact turns to BBC in wake of C5 deal. BBC and NBC open sales venture talks
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.