Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

Senate Passes A Bill to Cover Pension Plans

Article Abstract:

The Senate has passed a two-year pension bill to help certain companies save $8 billion in ways they calculate future contributions to their employees' plans. Now the Senate has to reconcile legislation with the two House bills passed in 2003. The Senate version offers more extensive relief, but the Bush administration and the secretaries of the Treasury, Commerce and Labor oppose the subsidy legislation and its possible impact on the struggling Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp on whose board they serve. The airlines and steel industries claim they need this legislation to survive financially. UPS has already withdrawn a proposal that would have limited its contributions to a plan run by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

Author: Walsh, Mary Williams
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 2004
Government regulation (cont), Government expenditures, Financial management, Government regulation, Courier Services, Security Guards and Patrol Services, Public affairs, Legislative Bodies, Legal/Government Regulation, Labor organizations, Labor Unions, Labor Unions and Similar Labor Organizations, Detective & armored car services, US House of Representatives, US Senate, Economic aspects, Laws, regulations and rules, Finance, Political activity, Economic policy, Delivery services, Political aspects, Pensions, Bush, George W., Corporations, United Parcel Service of America Inc., United States. Congress. Senate, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Corporate finance, United States. Congress. House, Company financing, Labour unions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Criticism Arises Over the Way Calling Plans Advertise Rates

Article Abstract:

Many consumers who have signed up for flat-rate unlimited calling plans that phone companies are currently marketing have found that their bills are larger than they were led to believe. The extra charges result from taxes and surplus fees which are not mentioned when offering the flat-rate. The phone companies respond to criticism over this policy by arguing that separating charges helps consumers understand their bill.

Author: Richtel, Matt
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 2003
COMMUNICATION, Communications, Broadcasting and Telecommunications, Commodity & service prices, Advertising, Advertising Activity, Telemarketing Services, Telemarketing Bureaus, Business services, not elsewhere classified, Telemarketing, Company legal issue, Cases, Prices and rates, Telecommunications services industry, Telecommunications industry, Investigations, Communications industry, False advertising, Company pricing policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: As Talks Resume, Verizon Argues With a Union Over an Ad Phrase. Verizon and Unions Meet With Mediator
  • Abstracts: Labor Adopts New Strategy. Verizon Talks Are Less Upbeat As Union Cites Unresolved Issues
  • Abstracts: Verizon Talks Are Less Upbeat As Union Cites Unresolved Issues. Norwegian Oil Workers Threaten a Wider Strike
  • Abstracts: Israel Agrees to Turn Over 2 Cities In West Bank, Aiding Peace Plan. Israelis Worry About Terror, By Jews Against Palestinians
  • Abstracts: TransAlta to invest in power projects. TransAlta to build Alberta power plant. TransAlta closing trading office, 20 staff affected
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.