Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

Containing prison costs through privatization

Article Abstract:

Professor Charles W. Thomas feels that states can cut tremendous costs by privatizing correctional facilities. Thomas, who is the director of the University of Florida's Private Corrections Project, maintains that privatization can save the government 15-25% capital investment and 10-15% in operating costs. Though 14 states have privately operated prisons, others lack the necessary legislation to do so. Professor Thomas also states that the maltreatment of prisoners in private prisons is an exaggerated fear.

Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1992
Management, Correctional institutions, Costs, Industrial, Industrial costs, Thomas, Charles W.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Privatization; a global trend

Article Abstract:

Britain has been the leader in privatization since 1979. The sale of 22% of British Telecom for approximately $10 billion is the largest recorded privatization deal. East Germany has given Treuhandanstalt, a holding company, the authority to sell its public companies. Russia has allowed citizens to buy share vouchers in newly privatized industries. Argentina and Mexico are also privatizing basic utilities to decrease their budget deficits. The US has far fewer industries to privatize than other countries.

Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1992
United Kingdom, International aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Does privatization improve service and lower costs?

Article Abstract:

There are two views on promoting privatization to improve service and lower costs. Those in favor of privatization maintain that the private sector's innovations, efficiency and competition improve services at lower costs. Those against privatization, however, claim that the little evidence available shows the same, or even higher, costs in privatization. Reduced costs are only obtained from lower wages and greater use of part-time labor Moreover, the private sector caters to the upper classes only.

Author: Starr, Paul, Butler, Stuart B.
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1992
Standards, Economic aspects, Industrial productivity, Government ownership, Nationalization

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Economic policy, Privatization, Privatization (Business)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Current situation: Discrimination or choice? Celebrity cases
  • Abstracts: Secondary prevention of intimate partner violence: A randomized control trial
  • Abstracts: Setting Environmental Priorities. Did evolution make males better at math? Are businesses better equipped than governments to address 21st-century environmental challenges?
  • Abstracts: Who pays? Has the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) exaggerated the threat of ozone layer depletion?
  • Abstracts: Settling out of court: alternative dispute resolution. At issue: should the statute of limitations be extended to allow adults who were child incest victims their day in court?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.