Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Anderson on reason and value

Article Abstract:

Elizabeth Anderson's two arguments against consequentialist ideas on reason and value are wrong. The first argument regarding rationality is based on coherent narrative unity. It stems from her defective perception of the forward looking doctrine of consequentialism and a confusion between consequentialists and economists. Attribution of intrinsic values to persons invariably entails an involvement into the state of affairs. Hence the second argument that consequentialism attributes intrinsic values to the state of affairs, instead of persons, is defective.

Author: Sturgeon, Nicholas L.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1996
Reason

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Making sense of value

Article Abstract:

Elizabeth Anderson's criteria of expressive norms for making sense of value is irrelevant to a person's rationality. According to her rational attitude theory of value, something is valuable if it makes sense for someone to value it and the expression of such valuations require shared social norms. To describe something or someone as valuable is to describe it or the person as rational. To judge something as valuable is to have a complex attitude towards the object of valuation.

Author: Piper, Adrian M.S.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1996
Ethical aspects, Social norms

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Does consequentialism make too many demands, or none at all?

Article Abstract:

Consequentialism is argued to be a theory of exacting moral standards but not of decisive reasons for agents to conform to these standards. Without augmentation, consequentialism is not simply a theory of exact standards but a theory of consequentialist moral reasons, a theory on which consequentialism makes demands on agents to meet its exacting moral standards.

Author: Hurley, Paul E.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 2006
Morality

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Evaluation, Criticism and interpretation, Values, Values (Philosophy), Consequentialism (Ethics), Value in Ethics and Economics (Book), Anderson, Elizabeth
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: An empirical investigation of factors affecting ethical optimism of nurses. Overcoming the theory/practice opposition in business ethics
  • Abstracts: Executives, professionals, and the morality of single-sex clubs. Women are whistleblowers
  • Abstracts: Is it good to make happy people? The principle of agency. Microethics in action
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.