Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation

Article Abstract:

The use of Quality Adjusted Life-Years (QALY) to allocate health care has been criticised as rationing that penalizes disabled or permanently ill persons. QALY places permanently handicapped people lower on the scale than the physically normal ones. Depending on the medical situation, the QALY puts more value on the treatment for a handicapped person over a normal person since the benefits of treatment for the handicapped person may be greater when the cost is the same. When the benefit from the treatment is the same for both, the normal person is given priority on the QALY scale.

Author: Singer, Peter (Judge), McKie, John, Kuhse, Helga, Richardson, Jeff
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
Health aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Straw men with broken legs: a response to Per Sundstrom

Article Abstract:

The advocacy of eugenics and euthanasia under the circumstances of severely disabled newborns or genetic counseling to prevent the conception of disabled newborns was misunderstood by Per Sundstrom and some Germans who opinioned that a person has no right to value one life higher than the other. However this controversy has been removed by indicating that the ethical issue of eugenics and euthanasia depends upon the condition of the patient.

Author: Singer, Peter (Judge)
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
Criticism and interpretation, Eugenics, Euthenics, Sundstrom, Per

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Double jeopardy and the veil of ignorance - a reply

Article Abstract:

The Quality Adjusted Life-Year (QALY) scale, and other similar methods that link quality of life to life expectancy, use it for determining specific allocations of health care finances. Although the defenders of QALY claim the equality of all beings, they implicitly attach different values to all lives. QALY also needs a large and comprehensive data collection. Problems related to such large data collections are highlighted.

Author: Harris, John
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
Analysis, Usage, Social values

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Care and treatment, Ethical aspects, Disabled persons, Quality of life, Health services administration
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Protecting communities in health research from exploitation. Editorial
  • Abstracts: Double-trouble: combining business and ethics. The feminine firm: a comment. Leadership: a discussion about ethics
  • Abstracts: Paid organ donation - the Grey Basket concept. Xenotransplantation. Doing harm: living organ donors, clinical research and 'The Tenth Man'
  • Abstracts: Doctors should not try to ban boxing - but boxing's own ethics suggests reform. Covert surveillance by doctors for life-threatening Munchausen's syndrome by proxy
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.