Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Friendship in the context of a consequentialist life

Article Abstract:

Neera Badhwar Kapur has argued that consequentialist motivations are incompatible with friendship, because friends are valued for their own sakes, not as means to an end. Her claim is undefended, and the discussion betrays a pessimism about the ability of individuals to contribute to positive social change. Kapur suggests that a consequentialist would have to give up a friendship that conflicted with a society's religious intolerance, but this is a very limited view of the choices. The consequentialist views friendship within the context of a life devoted to contributing to a better future.

Author: Gomberg, Paul
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1992
Social aspects, Napur, Neera Badhwar

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Indirect consequentialism, friendship, and the problem of alienation

Article Abstract:

Indirect consequentialism does not succeed in overcoming the problem that friendship poses for consequentialism. The consequentialist concern for maximizing the good is incompatible with friendship because the consequentialist must be prepared to abandon a friendship in order to maximize the good. Indirect consequentialism attempts to handle the problem by holding maximization of the good as a regulative ideal. However, this strategy is inadequate because it does not correctly identify the source of the problem.

Author: Cocking, Dean, Oakley, Justin
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1995
Alienation (Philosophy), Alienation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Can an indirect consequentialist be a real friend?

Article Abstract:

Dean Cocking and Justin Oakley's article titled 'Indirect Consequentialism, Friendship, and the Problem of Alienation,' is flawed as regards its criticism of Peter Railton's concept of indirect consequentialism. Their interpretation of Railton's 'counterfactual condition' failed to illustrate how the nature of the consequentialist psyche subsequently results to alienation in personal relationships.

Author: Mason, Elinor
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1998
Analysis, Cocking, Dean, Oakley, Justin, Railton, Peter

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Ethical aspects, Criticism and interpretation, Friendship, Consequentialism (Ethics), Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Two concepts of liberalism. Kymlicka, liberalism, and respect for cultural minorities
  • Abstracts: Bioethics at century's turn: can normative ethics be retrieved? Reply to Strong on principlism and casuistry
  • Abstracts: Two puzzles for Marquis's conservative view on abortion. Understanding the 'conservative' view on abortion. The moral difference between infanticide and abortion
  • Abstracts: Dispositional ethical realism. Cultural context and moral responsibility. Strawson's way of naturalizing responsibility
  • Abstracts: Egalitarianism and personal desert. Equality. The Answer to Kekes's Question(*)
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.