Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Genes, embryos, and future people

Article Abstract:

It is possible to test embryonic cells for genetic abnormalities and thereby to predict whether or to what degree the future human beings will have disease or disability. In addition, freezing of embryos for long time periods makes it possible to change a normal human lifespan. Shortcomings exist in somatic-cell gene therapy and germ-line genetic alteration. However testing and selective termination of genetically defective embryos is the medically and morally defensible way to save people from existence with severe disability and suffering that make lives not worth living. Ethical questions exist relative to frozen embryos.

Author: Glannon, Walter
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Bioethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0269-9702
Year: 1998
Gene therapy, Genetic disorders, Medical ethics, Frozen human embryos

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Locating the beginnings of pain

Article Abstract:

The question of whether a fetus feels pain is complicated by the fact that pain is a multidimensional process. The experience of pain requires not only sensation, but cognition, and this requires an emotional context to be considered conscious. Philosopher Daniel Dennett argues that to feel pain requires a sense of self which reflects upon the experience. This conscious conceptual system of object permanence does not begin until 12 months of age.

Author: Derbyshire, Stuart W.G.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Bioethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0269-9702
Year: 1999
Research, Fetus, Physiological aspects, Pain, Dennett, Daniel C.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Freedom and a right (not) to know

Article Abstract:

The article analyzes the relationship between the idea of a moral right to personal self-determination and the idea of a moral right to know or not to know. That the right to have or not have genetic information can be defended on the ground of a right to self-determination is argued, and that this defense presupposes several normative, and controversial arguments.

Author: Raikka, Juha
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Bioethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0269-9702
Year: 1998
Autonomy (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Ethical aspects, Genetic screening, Genetic testing, Abortion
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Oakeshott's theory of civil association. Freedom as antipower. Political justification, theoretical complexity, and democratic community
  • Abstracts: Commentary 1: the right to refuse treatment. Commentary 3: a response to Lowe
  • Abstracts: Conditions required for a law on active voluntary euthanasia: a survey of nurses' opinions in the Australian Capital Territory
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.