Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

How physician executives and clinicians perceive ethical issues in Saudi Arabian hospitals

Article Abstract:

Self-administered questionnaires have been used to gain an insight into the perceptions of physician executives and clinicians in Saudi Arabia about ethical issues their hospitals must address. This research has also compared the views of physician executives and clinicians on the attributes that lead to the emergence of ethical issues in their hospitals. It has been shown that there are differences in how physician executives and clinicians see the same situations. The two groups are likely to follow different ethical theories in how they view a specific situation.

Author: Saeed, Khalid Saad Bin
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1999
Saudi Arabia

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Voluntary euthanasia under control? Further empirical evidence from the Netherlands

Article Abstract:

A wide-reaching survey published in 1996 into end-of-life decisions by Dutch doctors in 1995 indicates that the intentional shortening of patients' lives without explicit request is by no means uncommon. In most cases, doctors did not discuss euthanasia with the patient because the patient was unable to do so, but not all patients whose lives were ended without an explicit request were incompetent. It is clear that doctors quite frequently resort to euthanasia, even when they feel that alternative treatments are available.

Author: Jochemsen, Henk, Keown, John
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1999
Ethical aspects, Euthanasia

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Responsibility to or for in the physician-patient relationship?

Article Abstract:

The emergence of neo-paternalism from malpractice litigation can remove a patient's moral agency by the physician taking both control and responsibility for all decisions from the patient. A better patient-physician relationship envisions medical treatment as a shared goal. The importance of communication between patient and physician in most situations has been realized with the possible exception of emergencies. The responsibility to patients instead of for patients can be a solution to neo-paternalism.

Author: McMillan, Richard C.
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
Physician and patient, Physician-patient relations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Physicians, Medical professions, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Medical ethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Human resources opportunities to balance ethics and neoclassical economics in global labor standards. The ethics of inactivity: human resource managers and quietism
  • Abstracts: Remediation and an ethical imperative: the role of public agency in environmental practice. Are we ready for God? Value and profit in sustainable development and market capitalism
  • Abstracts: Mothers, citizenship, and independence: a critique of pure family values. Citizenship, individualism, and democratic politics
  • Abstracts: Empathy and universalizability. Thomson on distress. Sympathy, simulation, and the impartial spectator
  • Abstracts: Teaching clinical ethics as a professional skill: bridging the gap between knowledge about ethics and its use in clinical practice
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.