Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Some paradoxes of whistleblowing

Article Abstract:

Whistleblowing refers to the revelation of information about an organization which would not ordinarily be revealed. It can be considered a form of disloyalty but is morally permissible under certain circumstances. These circumstances are part of the standard and accepted theory on whistleblowing. However, analysis of real incidents of whistleblowing showed that there are inconsistencies, or paradoxes between the accepted theory on whistleblowing and what is actually known about whistleblowing. These paradoxes are not simple exceptions but frequent paradoxes which violate the accepted theory.

Author: Davis, Michael
Publisher: University of Florida
Publication Name: Business & Professional Ethics Journal
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0277-2027
Year: 1996
Ethical aspects, Whistle blowing, Whistleblowing, Employee loyalty

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Technical decisions: time to rethink the engineer's reponsibilities?

Article Abstract:

Engineering ethics is still a vague concept in many corporations. Most managers do not include engineers in decision-making and engineers do not know the kind of information that may be ethically withheld from managers. Since engineering work is extremely compartmentalized, engineers tend to be less responsible for the actions that they make. Indeed, technical decisions would have to take into account ethical issues that most companies apparently fail to consider.

Author: Davis, Michael
Publisher: University of Florida
Publication Name: Business & Professional Ethics Journal
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0277-2027
Year: 1992
Engineering ethics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Professional responsibility: just following the rules?

Article Abstract:

Following established social norms is sufficient for generating responsible conduct in most professions. Professional ethics and virtue are larger issues, while strict and blind obedience conflict with following rules.

Author: Davis, Michael
Publisher: University of Florida
Publication Name: Business & Professional Ethics Journal
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0277-2027
Year: 1999
Business ethics, Social norms, Responsibility

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis
  • The Subtle Roar of Online Whistle-blowing: Julian Assange
  • Publikum der Whistleblowing-Diskussion
  • Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, at New Media Days 09
  • Engineers
  • Engineer 2.0 - the Networked Engineer
  • Engineer - Bubble Men
  • Engineer's Notebook
  • cool compartmentalized box
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: What is at stake in taking responsibility? Lessons from third-party property insurance. Consumer sovereignty, rationality and the mandatory labelling of genetically modified food
  • Abstracts: Individual responsibility in the American corporate system: Does Sarbenes-Oxley strike the right balance? The future of corporate social responsibility
  • Abstracts: Codes of ethics: investment company money managers versus other financial professionals. The corruption of financial markets: Systemic inevitability or aberration?
  • Abstracts: Places for pluralism. Pluralism, determinacy, and dilemma. Trust as noncognitive security about motives
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.