Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Why ethics is not the only thing that matters

Article Abstract:

Manuel Velasquez has provided an important defense for the profitability of being fair and just. However, he has oversimplified human character. The motivation and behavior of people is often due to the conflict between ethical and self-interest impulses which was demonstrated by the experiment conducted by van Avemaet. Moral psychologists have to figure out these conflicts together with the fact that people are motivated not just by ethics but by a myriad of other things such as success, friendship, sex, money, prestige and love.

Author: Messick, David M.
Publisher: Society of Business Ethics
Publication Name: Business Ethics Quarterly
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 1052-150X
Year: 1996
Economic aspects, Criticism and interpretation, Justice, Fairness, Velasquez, Manuel

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Social categories and business ethics

Article Abstract:

Ingroup favoritism almost invariably results when people group others, including themselves, into social categories. The concept refers to the tendency to treat one's group members more favorably than those outside of one's own group. Two problems in business ethics are examined from the perspective of ingroup favoritism. Ways by which social psychological principles and findings may be used to help resolve racial or gender discrimination matters in business settings are proposed.

Author: Messick, David M.
Publisher: Society of Business Ethics
Publication Name: Business Ethics Quarterly
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 1052-150X
Year: 1998
Business Ethics, Social aspects, Analysis, Work groups, Teamwork (Workplace), Organizational behavior, Social perception

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


On the power of a clear definition of rationality

Article Abstract:

The term 'rationality' in 'Judgment in Managerial Decision Making' is useful and creates an important dialogue between philosophical and psychological perspectives of ethics and morality. Although behavioral research can gain insight by using only philosophical discussions of rationality, the two perspectives should be present in clearly defining rationality. These should also offer falsifiable predictions and provide insights that can be tested empirically.

Author: Bazerman, Max H., Messick, David M.
Publisher: Society of Business Ethics
Publication Name: Business Ethics Quarterly
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 1052-150X
Year: 1998
Psychological aspects, Decision-making, Decision making, Management, Ethical aspects, Ethics, Rationalization (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Business ethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Business ethics and politics in China. The role of character in business ethics. Socratic ethics and the challenge of globalization
  • Abstracts: Authority and autonomy. Altruism, ingroups, and fairness: comments on David Messick's "Social Categories and Business Ethics."
  • Abstracts: Who are the stakeholders? What difference does it make? Truisms in business ethics. Stakeholders and consent
  • Abstracts: An Aristotelian approach to ethical corporate leadership. Emotions and practical reasoning: implications for business ethics
  • Abstracts: On golden rules, balancing acts, & finding the right size. Naturalism and business ethics: inevitable foes or possible allies?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.