Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Camus and his critics on capital punishment

Article Abstract:

Albert Camus' essay, "Reflections on the Guillotine" depicts his opposition to the institution of capital punishment. Camus attacks capital punishment which is based on the possibility of judicial errors and diverse verdicts. He feels capital punishment is a violation of Christian norms and devolves excessive powers to the state. Thomas Molnar charges that Camus' ideas are sentimental and overlook individual responsibility. However, Molnar's and Walter Berns's critiques against Camus are absolutistic and they avoid Camus' main arguments against absolutism and relativism.

Author: Lazere, Donald
Publisher: Intercollegiate Studies Institute Inc.
Publication Name: Modern Age
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0026-7457
Year: 1996
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Criticism and interpretation, Capital punishment, Camus, Albert, Berns, Walter, Molnar, Thomas

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reframing incrementalism: a constructive response to the critics

Article Abstract:

The concept of incrementalism is one of the most widely cited as well as criticized ideas in the policy sciences. Although the concept has important elements in political and organizational life, its deeper implications are not understood enough for it to be useful to other scholars. The misunderstandings are due partly to incrementalism's differences with Western culture's fundamental principles. Thus, the concept may have to be reframed with emphasis on the spirit rather than the letter that unproductive debates may be avoided.

Author: Weiss, Andrew, Woodhouse, Edward
Publisher: Springer
Publication Name: Policy Sciences
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0032-2687
Year: 1992
Evaluation, Social policy, Social sciences

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Voegelin and Heidegger as critics of modernity

Article Abstract:

Prominent critics of modernity in the twentieth century, ERic Voegelin and Martin Heidegger are discussed.

Author: Henry, Michael D.
Publisher: Intercollegiate Studies Institute Inc.
Publication Name: Modern Age
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0026-7457
Year: 2001
Portrayals, Modernism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Practical internationalism: the United States and collective security. Defining moments
  • Abstracts: Common-pool resources and international environmental politics. The politics of sustainable development: global norms for national implementation
  • Abstracts: Algeria tries to escape the nightmare. Shared response to the market shocks? Passive response sends wrong signal
  • Abstracts: The politics of the Bangladesh Environmental Protection Act. part 2 Japan's changing approach to environmental issues
  • Abstracts: Distributive justice and international trade. Reconciliation for realists. A different kind of justice: dealing with human rights violations in transitional societies
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.