Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Federalism in the twenty-first century: will states exist?

Article Abstract:

The erosion of state and local power by the federal government must end if states are to survive. Two current threats are the move to place child support under control of the federal bureaucracy and the Uruguay Round of GATT, which would supersede conflicting state laws. This trend toward loss of state power needs to be reversed so that states will be free to innovate. The US Supreme Court could assist in this effort by upholding congressional term limits and by reexamining its decisions in United States v Darby and in Garcia v San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority.

Author: Du Pont, Pierre S.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1993
Forecasts and trends, Federal-state controversies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


But when exactly was judicially-enforced federalism "born" in the first place?

Article Abstract:

US constitutional history from 1787 to 1937 shows that judicially-enforced federalism has been largely mythical. The Founders envisioned politics, rather than the courts, as the principal limit on Congress' exercise of its Article I powers. Supreme Court enforcement of federalism did not really come until 1935 in response to New Deal legislation, only to be abandoned in 1937. A proper division of federal and state power has prevailed despite the lack of judicial enforcement.

Author: Kramer, Larry D.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1998
United States, Interpretation and construction, History, Political aspects, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation, Constitutional history

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Tao of federalism

Article Abstract:

Taoism's principle that everything is understood by knowing its opposite applies to the separation of state and federal powers because federalism does not mean that the states possess those powers the federal government does not claim. The US Supreme Court's approach to federalism has been contradictory and flawed. The Court's approach will be difficult to change despite the Court's ability to enforce federalism principles.

Author: Massey, Calvin R.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1997
Influence, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Taoism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Federalism, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: General elections in the Netherlands, May 1994: the triumph of grey liberalism. Animals, politics and justice: Rawlsian liberalism and the plight of non-humans
  • Abstracts: Policy in style. The uncertain state of American environmentalism
  • Abstracts: They are legion: the tragedy of twentieth-century man. Pavel Florensky: a postmodernist vision of Renaissance art?
  • Abstracts: Morality and monopoly: the constitutional political economy of religious rules. Foreign profits and the political economy of quotas
  • Abstracts: ACT-SO showcasing the best and the brightest. The rise and fall of Freedom National Bank. ACT-SO jewels shine brightest during national competition
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.