Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Forbidden favoritism in the government accommodation of religion: Grumet and the case for overturning Aguilar

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court's 1994 Grumet decision on religious accommodation of special needs students could lead to overturning the 1985 Aguilar decision. The Grumet majority, while holding states cannot create school districts for children of specific religions, called for reconsidering Aguilar, which prohibited public school special education services on-site at religious schools. The Grumet decision set forth guidelines for governmental fairness that could allow expanded religious accommodation within the public schools.

Author: Tsingos, Basilios E.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1995
Special education, School districts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Good Friday vacation as an establishment of religion: Metzl v. Leininger, 57 F.3d 618 (7th Cir. 1995)

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit erred in finding in Metzl v. Leininger that the state of Illinois had the burden of showing a secular purpose for Good Friday school holiday legislation. Since this burden was not met, the court found that the legislation violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by favoring Christians. Allowing for this holiday should not be seen as government advocacy of a particular religion, and the law should have been upheld as a de minimis accommodation.

Author: Kerr, Orin S.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Holidays, Good Friday

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Supreme Court's shifting tolerance for public aid to parochial schools and the implications for educational choice

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court in Agostini v. Felton overruled its 1985 decision in Aguilar v. Felton and held that the entanglement prong of the "Lemon test" was not appropriate for use in determining establishment of religion issues. The 5-4 decision exhibits the Court's liberalized view of public aid arrangements which benefit parochial schools. The correct decision will allow equal participation in government benefits.

Author: Roberson, Doug
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1998
Expenditures, Public, Public expenditures, School, Choice of, School choice, Church schools, Parochial schools

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Church and state, Case Note
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Decision concerning the implementation of the tax sharing system. Verbal publicity material concerning support for the curbing of Lin Xiangao's illegal activities by the religious affairs department of the Guangzhou municipal people's government (December 5, 1983)
  • Abstracts: E-government to combat corruption: the case of Seoul Metropolitan Government. Developing business education infrastructure in Eastern Europe: Albanian experience
  • Abstracts: The writing of the Constitution and the writing on the wall. The proposed equal protection fix for abortion law: reflections on citizenship, gender, and the Constitution
  • Abstracts: Congress fumbles with the Internet. Free speech and freer speech
  • Abstracts: Putting the nuclear genie back in the bottle. Nukes are still the worry. The new terror: nutcakes with nukes
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.