Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Formalism and state sovereignty in Printz v. United States: cooperation by consent

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court, in Printz v. US, upheld state sovereignty against the federal government. Printz involved the Brady Act, which required local sheriffs to conduct background checks on purchasers of firearms. The Court invalidated the law because the federal government had no constitutional authority for commandeering a state official. The Court thus acted on strict principles of legal formalism to reinforce a federal system in which the state and federal governments are properly separated.

Author: Gold, Andrew S.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1998
Political aspects, Sovereignty, Legal formalism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Context and complementarity within federalism doctrine

Article Abstract:

Competing doctrines of constitutional law with regard to federalism may best be analyzed in the aggregate rather than in isolation. Two Supreme Court cases illustrate. Pennsylvania v. Union Gas established the state-commandeering rule subordinating the states to Congress, whereas Seminole Tribe v. Florida established the state-immunity rule that protected state sovereignty. The principle of doctrinal complements shows that these seemingly antagonistic holdings are actually interconnected.

Author: Caminker, Evan H.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


In the beginning are the states

Article Abstract:

The states are the American people's ultimate protection against a tyrannical federal government. The Constitution itself says little about the states. In particular, it says little or nothing about the origin of the states, the source of state sovereignty, the constitutional function of the states, or the structural rules pertaining to the states. Rather, the states are so fundamental that the Constitution presupposes their existence.

Author: Harrison, John C.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1998
States, State rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Federalism, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Constitutional law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: War against Taiwan: on the United States. War against Taiwan: the Mainland and Taiwan
  • Abstracts: Governing institutions for sustainable development: the United Kingdom's national level approach. The political economy of sustainable development
  • Abstracts: U.S. sanctions Russian entities for Iranian dealings. Senate approves sanctions legislation aimed at Russian-Iranian missle cooperation
  • Abstracts: US says N Korea site nuclear free; Perry visits Pyongyang. North Korea freezes missile tests; U.S. lifts sanctions; Perry report released
  • Abstracts: Formalism, functionalism, ignorance, judges. Relationships between formalism and functionalism in separation of powers cases
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.