Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Libertarianism, entitlement, and responsibility

Article Abstract:

Libertarianism asserts that individuals are entitled to enjoy the fruits of their labor while holding them responsible for the outcomes that arise from their actions. These two fundamental concepts of libertarian theory, entitlement and outcome-responsibility, stresses the liability of people for the harmful effects flowing from any of their activities. The basic flaw of this line of reasoning is that a single individual cannot be held responsible for the harmful outcomes caused by an action committed together with another individual.

Author: Perry, Stephen R.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Philosophy & Public Affairs
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0048-3915
Year: 1997
Causation, Causation (Philosophy), Libertarianism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos

Article Abstract:

Respect and equality are values that are important in egalitarian ethos but these may conflict with each other. In the theory and practice of egalitarianism, giving respect its due provides a reason for egalitarians to favor unconditional welfare benefits. In the same way, insisting on equality for all can undermine respect and self-respect. Thus, it is important for egalitarians to have principles at all levels to balance the implications of extreme equality or respect.

Author: Wolff, Jonathan
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Philosophy & Public Affairs
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0048-3915
Year: 1998
Analysis, Equality, Respect

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner

Article Abstract:

The egalitarian theory suggests that society should provide security to people against poor outcomes that result from factors beyond their control. Ronald Dworkin believes that the distribution of resources should be aspiration-sensitive and not endowment-sensitive, as aspirations are controlled by an individual. The distribution of wealth is dependent on people's responsibilities controlled by the circumstances and the efforts taken by them.

Author: Roemer, John E.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Philosophy & Public Affairs
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0048-3915
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Social aspects, Responsibility
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Human rights, religion, and the cosmopolitan sensibility. Europe's walls and human rights
  • Abstracts: Present and past. Moldova and the new Bessarabian questions. Romania: the ability to surprise
  • Abstracts: Superpower without a cause (or a foreign policy). Where the normal American meets the Muslim cleric
  • Abstracts: Russia and America at mid-transition. The United States, Japan, and the future of Russia. United States foreign policy after the Soviet collapse
  • Abstracts: Security issues and the Eastern Slavic states. Trump and trap. Moscow retreats to a Chechen stalemate
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.