Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Takings legislation: a comment

Article Abstract:

Targeted compensation legislation should be favored over takings-assessment legislation by property-rights proponents. The takings-assessment approach calls on regulatory agencies to evaluate takings implications of their actions, but this approach raises enforcement problems. Compensation legislation should be aimed at regulatory programs with the most potential for abuse. A loser-pays provision for attorneys' fees should be included. Compensation should not be based on a percentage threshold, but should apply to reduction in value that results from a ban on land uses that are normal or have externalities that are not worse than normal.

Author: Ellickson, Robert C.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Endangered species, Compensation (Law), Regulatory taking (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The untenable case for an unconditional right to shelter

Article Abstract:

Those who advocate recognition of an unconditional right to shelter fail to consider society's need to maintain incentives to work. Federal and state constitutions give citizens the right to self-ownership of labor and the right to receive schooling. These provisions create incentives to work, which would be undermined by an unconditional right to shelter. Besides, housing conditions are not better in nations which recognize rights to shelter than in the US. Any shift toward unconditional welfare rights should be rejected.

Author: Ellickson, Robert C.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1992
Homeless shelters, Housing policy, Civil rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The market for "law-and" scholarship

Article Abstract:

Negative criticism of the increase in and large amount of literature produced by law and economics and other disciplines joined with the study of law is misplaced. The joining of law with other disciplines is valuable from academic and practical standpoints. Market demands such as those emanating from clients of the legal profession and hiring committees of universities can check academic overindulgence.

Author: Ellickson, Robert C.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1997
Analysis, Evaluation, Universities and colleges, Curricula, College curriculum, Law and economics, Law and economics (Jurisprudence), Interdisciplinary approach to knowledge

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Political aspects
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Corruption: Diagnosis and treatment. The political-party landscape. EU accession is no "end of history"
  • Abstracts: The microregulation of the health care marketplace. ISO quick fix, free lunch, and share of pie
  • Abstracts: Industrial organization and 'Human Action'. The methodology of 'Human Action'. Reflections on 'Human Action' after 50 years
  • Abstracts: Who was that straw man anyway? A comment on Evans and Rice. Foreword. Cost and performance: a comparison of the individual and group health insurance market
  • Abstracts: Provisional regulations on the management of temporary identity cards. Detailed regulations for implementing the "Regulations on Residence Identity Cards of the People's Republic of China"
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.