Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

The Energy Charter Treaty and trade: a guide to the labyrinth

Article Abstract:

The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is a multilateral agreement limited to the energy sector which was signed on Dec. 17, 1994. The ECT covers several areas ranging from investment and transit to trade and the environment. Concerning trade, the ECT incorporates by reference some provisions of the GATT and its related documents and determines applicable rules on the basis of whether or not the ECT Contracting Parties are party to the GATT, and, if so, whether as part of GATT 1947 or GATT 1944.

Author: Swaak-Goldman, Olivia Q.
Publisher: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of World Trade (Law-Economics-Public Policy)
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 1011-6702
Year: 1996
Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities, Energy Policy NEC, International aspects, Energy policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Injury-causality test under Canadian trade remedy law: a case study of subsidized boneless manufacturing beef from the EEC

Article Abstract:

Canada's Special Import Measures Act was enacted in 1984 to implement the the GATT Subsidies Code of 1979. A 1986 investigation by the Canadian Import Tribunal over manufacturing beef imported from the EC demonstrates the measures an investigation must pursue to prove material injury from trade subsidies. The Canadian tribunal used a sophisticated econometric model that might not lend itself to other investigations and is not sufficient evidence on its own to prove unfair trade.

Author: Huang, Hsin, Krakar, Eileen, Uhm, Ihn Ho
Publisher: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of World Trade (Law-Economics-Public Policy)
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 1011-6702
Year: 1993
Cases, International trade, Unfair competition (Commerce), Unfair competition, Beef industry

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Prospects for liberalization of trade in agriculture

Article Abstract:

There is a misconception that European farmers do not really exert an impact on public policy because they constitute only about 5% of the total EU labor force and therefore public financial support for them cannot rally amount to much in the overall European economy. However, it will be shown that the high cost of farm protection in Europe has far-flung economic consequences as well as other consequences transcending the economic sphere.

Author: Gylfason, Thorvaldur
Publisher: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of World Trade (Law-Economics-Public Policy)
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 1011-6702
Year: 1998
Agricultural Programs, Regulation of Agricultural Marketing and Commodities, Agricultural Support Prices, Economic aspects, European Union, Agricultural policy, Agricultural price supports

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Europe
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The greening of participatory democracy: a reconsideration of theory. Sustainable management and the pastoral ideal
  • Abstracts: The adversarial-accusatorial label: a constraint on the search for truth. Against exclusion (except to protect truth or prevent privacy violations)
  • Abstracts: Does Africa matter? Eco-imperialism and bio-monopoly at the Earth Summit. A fate worse than imperialism in Africa
  • Abstracts: The multilateral trading system: the way ahead. Trading justice for truth. Tough task ahead
  • Abstracts: Third party mediation: an obstacle to peace in Nagorno Karabakh. This land is our land: Moro ancestral domain and its implications for peace and development in the southern Philippines
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.