Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

The scope and constitutionality of judicial review under the Tunney Act

Article Abstract:

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit correctly limited judicial review under the Tunney Act in accordance with separation of powers in United States v. Microsoft Corp. The Circuit Court held that a district court does not have the authority to consider matters not covered in the original antitrust complaint and consent decree when conducting a public interest review under the Tunney Act. Judicial review is limited to considering the relationship between the complaint and the consent decree, thus preventing the judicial branch from usurping powers of the executive branch.

Author: Teitelbaum, Joshua C.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1996
Judicial review, Public interest, Case Note

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Access demands to payment systems joint ventures

Article Abstract:

The development of payment systems joint ventures has been impeded by antitrust access demands, which often lead to litigation and subsequent alliances between competing companies. Joint ventures, including point of sale, ATM, and credit card networks, are increasingly entering treaties to end court battles over access, rather than competing by improving services and products. One proposal suggests barring legal action unless the excluded party can meet a three-part access test.

Author: Balto, David A.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1995
Banking industry, Analysis, Joint ventures

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Tilting the table: collective bargaining after National Baseball Ass'n v. Williams

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit ruled in National Basketball Ass'n v. Williams on whether professional basketball teams retained their antitrust immunity when engaged in collective bargaining negotiation with team members. The court held that antitrust immunity lasted beyond the collective labor agreement's expiration date, instead covering the whole collective bargaining relationship. This decision was too broad and may hinder future collective bargaining.

Author: Holden, Blythe A.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1995
Collective bargaining, Professional sports

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Antitrust law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The quality of Democracy: an overview. Freedom as the foundation. Addressing Inequality
  • Abstracts: The writing of the Constitution and the writing on the wall. The proposed equal protection fix for abortion law: reflections on citizenship, gender, and the Constitution
  • Abstracts: Federalism and constitutional design. Forcing the pace of democratization
  • Abstracts: Federal preclusion on state-imposed congressional term limits: United States Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton. A jurisdictional vacuum in the wake of Camps Newfound/Owatonna?
  • Abstracts: Congress fumbles with the Internet. Free speech and freer speech
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.