Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

Federal preclusion on state-imposed congressional term limits: United States Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton that Arkansas' term limits amendment for members of Congress was unconstitutional. More specifically, the ruling stated that imposing additional qualifications on federal legislators was not one of the powers reserved for the states by the Constitution's Tenth Amendment. The Court's analysis would have been more cogent had it used that amendment's proper default rule. This decision devalued federalism and would likely even survive a constitutional amendment on the subject of term limits.

Author: Zubler, Todd Cornelius
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1995
Estoppel

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A jurisdictional vacuum in the wake of Camps Newfound/Owatonna?

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court in Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Town of Harrison added to already existing confusion by striking down on dormant commerce clause grounds Maine legislation which imposed a real estate tax. Any regulations in this area will be tenuous because the Court, in the prior case of United States v. Lopez, left confusion as to whether even congressional regulations would be valid. The Court's authority to strike down the Maine statute in the first instance is tenuous.

Author: Kysilka, Karin J.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1997
Real property tax, Real property taxes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Ninth Circuit ignores principles of federalism and the Rooker-Feldman doctrine

Article Abstract:

The US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Bates v. Jones upheld the validity of term limits for specified California state offices. The correct decision superficially supports principals of federalism and 10th Amendment state power which the court should have expressly protected. The court should have relied upon the Rooker-Feldman doctrine which would have denied it appellate review of the state court decision in the instant case.

Author: Snider, Blake A.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1998
California

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Federalism, Term limits, Case Note
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The case for presidential term limits. Pathways from authoritarianism. The rise of "Muslim democracy"
  • Abstracts: The search for macroeconomic stability: comment on Sumner. Public export inspections in the United States and their privatization
  • Abstracts: Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Europe from the bottom: Assessing personal gains and losses and its effects on EU support
  • Abstracts: Keeping the State's secrets. Tough to manage. Fork in the road
  • Abstracts: The secret plot to suppress Falun Gong: the inside story. San Guo Yan Yi (A romance of the three kingdoms): the United States, Japan, and China
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.