Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Associative processes in false recall and false recognition

Article Abstract:

The study of associated events can induce false memory, with experiments involving the study of words on a list showing that false recognition and false recall are apparently related to the total number of associated words listed. The inclusion of filler words did not affect false recall levels. False recognition grew in direct relation to the number of associate words listed, implying that false recall is not dependent on the mean associative strength of the words listed. Further experiments are required to test this theory.

Author: Roediger, Henry L., III, Robinson, Kerry J.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1997
Recovered memory (Psychology), Recovered memory

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: an exemplar-based interpretation

Article Abstract:

Previous findings suggest that the dissociation between categorization and recognition performance in amnesic and normal people is brought about by separate memory systems. These dissociations can also be explained using a single-system exemplar memory model. This model takes the difference across groups into account. The quantitative predictions of the categorization-recognition dissociation based on this model are presented.

Author: Nosofsky, Robert M., Zaki, Safa R.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1998
Recognition (Psychology), Categorization (Psychology), Recognition (Memory)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Disparate effects of repeated testing: reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) results

Article Abstract:

Marked discrepancies charactrize Bartlett's 1932 and Ballard's 1913 experiments on recall. Two factors are hypothesized as responsible for the discrepant results, the type of material used and the interval between tests. The latter is considered the primary factor. Short intervals between succesive tests produces improvement in recall whereas long intervals between tests produce forgetfulness. Results support the hypotheses.

Author: Wheeler, Mark A., Roediger, Henry L., III
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Memory, Association of ideas, Association (Psychology)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Assimilation and anticipation in continuous spoken word recognition. Lexical ambiguity resolution and spoken word recognition: bridging the gap
  • Abstracts: Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. High-and low-frequency words are recalled equally well in alternating lists: evidence for assocaitive effects in serial recall
  • Abstracts: Personal reliance on alternative event-management processes in four countries. Experienced acceptability: measuring perceptions of dysfunctional leadership
  • Abstracts: Somewhere in time - temporal factors in vertebrate movement analysis. A mobility gradient in the organization of vertebrate movement: the perception of movement through symbolic language
  • Abstracts: A psychophysical evaluation of diminishing returns in riskless decision making. Personal attributes of expert auditors
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.