Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

A psychophysical evaluation of diminishing returns in riskless decision making

Article Abstract:

The role of numerosity on diminishing returns (DR) was examined. Value and numerosity functions were compared to account for DR for riskless commodity bundles, in this case toiletries. The pattern of results indicate that the marginal utility for a unit decreases as the total amount increases, as earlier studies had suggested. The findings indicate that the numerosity function of DR should be considered in research as empirical data are consistent with numerosity model predictions.

Author: Shanteau, James, Troutman, C. Michael
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1992
Psychological aspects, Decision-making, Decision making, Economics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Personal attributes of expert auditors

Article Abstract:

The beliefs and attitudes of expert auditors about their field were surveyed. The subjects were classiffied as either a manager, supervisor or a student. Results showed that most of the perceptions were similar across the three groups. Managers placed importance on behavior, supervisors on strategy and students on observable traits. These results indicate that professionals do have their own notions on expertise and that there are important differences regarding these notions.

Author: Shanteau, James, Abdolmohammadi, Mohammad J.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1992
Auditors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Competence in experts: the role of task characteristics

Article Abstract:

The Theory of Expert Competence provides an alternative view about experts from that provided by decision research and cognitive science. This theory presents five factors that determine expert competence. These include the amount of knowledge in the area, psychological factors, cognitive skills, decision strategies and task characteristics. The last aspect is considered to be of primary importance.

Author: Shanteau, James
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1992
Performance, Expertise

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Specialists, Specialization
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A psychometric analysis of the "divide and conquer" principle in multicriteria decision making. A probabilistic model of criticality in a sequential public good dilemma
  • Abstracts: Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: promotion and prevention in decision-making. Regulatory focus theory: implications for the study of emotions at work
  • Abstracts: Neuropsychological evidence for case-specific reading: multi-letter units in visual word recognition. Visual similarity effects in immediate verbal serial recall
  • Abstracts: Morphological alteration of temporal lobe gray matter in dyslexia: an MRI study. MRI neuroimaging of childhood psychiatric disorders: A selective review
  • Abstracts: Psychological factors and depressive symptoms in ischemic heart disease. Motivation and dietary self-care in adults with diabetes: are self-efficacy and autonomous self-regulation complementary or competing constructs?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.