Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Examining the effect of information sequence on Patriot air defense officers' judgments

Article Abstract:

A study was conducted with Patriot air defense officers to determine the effects of information sequence on the judgment and actions of these pilots. According to the Hogarth-Einhorn model, sequence of information has a significant effect on judgment. Results of the experiment were consistent with this theory. This indicates that the performance of pilots may be enhanced given the optimum sequencing of data.

Author: Adelman, Leonard, Bresnick, Terry
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1992
Human information processing, Air defenses

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Causality does influence conjunctive probability judgments if context and design allow it

Article Abstract:

The impact of perceived causality on conjunctive probability judgments is studied. Results show that causality affects conjunctive probability judgments and conjunction fallacies when the existence or nonexistence of causality is manipulated as a within-subject factor. The findings also contradict the results of Thuring and Jungermann (1990) who manipulated causality as a between-subjects factor.

Author: Caverni, Jean Paul, Jungermann, Helmut, Fabre, Jean-Marc
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1995
Causation, Causation (Philosophy)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Perspective-taking judgments of medication acceptance: inferences from relative importance about the impact and combination of information

Article Abstract:

The inference of health treatment judgments on the basis of reported relative importance of information is investigated. Three cues are considered, namely, side effects, severity of condition and trust. Subjects are found to differ in their treatment of the importance of the three cues. Subjects also adjust their judgments so that the cue perceived to be most important has the largest net effect.

Author: Moore, Colleen F., Wills, Celia E.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1996
Medical care

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Decision-making, Decision making, Judgment, Judgment (Psychology)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The effects of decision consequences on auditor's reliance on decision aids in audit planning. Affective influences on judgements and behavior in organizations: an information processing perspective
  • Abstracts: Fluoxetine in the treatment of borderline and schizotypal personality disorders. Serotonergic measures in the brains of suicide victims: 5-HT(subscript 2) binding sites in the frontal cortex of suicide victims and control subjects
  • Abstracts: Relation of CSF neurotensin concentrations to symptoms and drug response of psychotic patients. Comorbid postpartum depression and bereavement: a complicated case
  • Abstracts: Cognitive biases and the emotional disorders. Fear-relevant illusory correlations: what types of associations promote judgmental bias?
  • Abstracts: The rational mind and the problem of volition. The study of goals in psychology. On the nature and functions of motivation theories
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.